Sinja Kraus vs Emma Namnieks Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kraus vs Namnieks analysis and find out who is favored!
Sinja Kraus vs Emma Namnieks Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kraus has won 44.73% of points on his second serve, while Namnieks has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kraus, in recent form, has won 56.45% of his opponent's second serve points, while Namnieks has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.7% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kraus has saved 51.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Namnieks has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kraus has won 48.44% of matches played (W/L 31/ 33), with Namnieks winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kraus has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 126/ 67), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 21/ 33). Namnieks has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Kraus has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.84% of matches (W/L 21/ 22), where as Namnieks has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kraus winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kraus winning 2 and Namnieks winning 0. The last match between Kraus and Namnieks was at the W25 Parnu, 02-08-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Sinja Kraus getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:42:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kraus and Namnieks have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kraus winning 0 times and Namnieks 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kraus winning 0, and Namnieks 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kraus has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.7 while Namnieks has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kraus has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Namnieks has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kraus has converted 47.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Namnieks has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kraus 1 - 0 Namnieks
6
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
180
Rank
151
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (177-133)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-1)
50% (9-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$55,614
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sinja Kraus | Emma Namnieks |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 1 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 0:42:0 | 0:42:0 |
1st Serve % | 68% (23/34) | 51% (18/35) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (16/23) | 22% (4/18) |
2nd Serve Win% | 73% (8/11) | 18% (3/17) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 33% (1/3) |
Return Points W% | 80% (28/35) | 29% (10/34) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-1 |
Sinja Kraus
Player
Emma Namnieks
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
51%
(
18 of
35)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
17
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sinja Kraus | Emma Namnieks |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 48% (20/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (185/193) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.24 | 0 |
Aces Total | 44 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.36 | 0 |
DFs Total | 66 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:37:49 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 217.67 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (701/1271) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 64% (447/701) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (254/570) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (62/135) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (565/1274) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sinja Kraus Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Sinja Kraus
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(10) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dominika Salkova
Player
Sinja Kraus
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Sinja Kraus
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Anna Bondar
Player
Sinja Kraus
48%
(
31 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
8
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-7(2) 6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sinja Kraus
Player
Elizabet Hamaliy
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Sinja Kraus
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sinja Kraus
Player
Maja Chwalinska
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
83 of
126)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
48 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
62 of
126)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sinja Kraus
Player
Urszula Radwanska
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
71 of
100)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Sinja Kraus
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
14
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Sinja Kraus
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
52%
(
51 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
46 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Emma Namnieks Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Sinja Kraus
Player
Emma Namnieks
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
51%
(
18 of
35)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more