Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty vs Emily Seibold Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bhamidipaty vs Seibold analysis and find out who is favored!
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty vs Emily Seibold Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bhamidipaty has won 44.29% of points on his second serve, while Seibold has won 45.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bhamidipaty, in recent form, has won 58.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Seibold has won 63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.87% and 42.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bhamidipaty has saved 58.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Seibold has saved 62.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bhamidipaty has won 61.02% of matches played (W/L 36/ 23), with Seibold winning 44.12% (W/L 15/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bhamidipaty has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 11/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Seibold has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 35/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Bhamidipaty has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.14% of matches (W/L 25/ 18), where as Seibold has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 6/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bhamidipaty winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bhamidipaty winning 0 and Seibold winning 2. The last match between Bhamidipaty and Seibold was at the W15 Nagpur, 03-03-2022, Second, Clay with Emily Seibold getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bhamidipaty and Seibold have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bhamidipaty winning 0 times and Seibold 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Bhamidipaty winning 0, and Seibold 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bhamidipaty has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.93 while Seibold has played against players with an average rank of 209.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bhamidipaty has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Seibold has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bhamidipaty has converted 47.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Seibold has converted 51.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bhamidipaty 0 - 1 Seibold
428
Rank
426
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
881
Rank
442
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
57% (78-59)
Career Total W/L
54% (147-127)
56% (10-8)
YTD W/L
58% (11-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bhamidipaty VS Seibold H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty | Emily Seibold |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 9 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:0 | 2:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (43/75) | 52% (44/85) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (26/43) | 70% (31/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (14/32) | 51% (21/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (33/85) | 47% (35/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Bhamidipaty VS Seibold H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Emily Seibold
Player
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
8
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty | Emily Seibold |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (10/8) | 58% (11/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (23/19) | 63% (25/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (204/175) | 57% (192/145) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 62% (8/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 78 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0.64 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 117 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:57 | 1:39:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 359.67 | 158.74 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (633/1233) | 63% (680/1084) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (436/633) | 65% (441/680) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (261/600) | 45% (182/404) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (76/156) | 52% (84/163) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (538/1129) | 50% (553/1116) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (10/8) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (10/18) | 61% (11/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (7/0) |
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriella Price
Player
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
Player
Polina Iatcenko
47%
(
33 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
47%
(
16 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
19 of
34)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
100%
(
16 of
16)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
49
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
Player
Viktoria Morvayova
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
42%
(
28 of
67)
7
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
Player
Irina Maria Bara
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
55%
(
16 of
29)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
13 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Zolotareva
Player
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
51%
(
49 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
49 of
96)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
15
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
17 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
85
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
43%
(
23 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Korneeva
Player
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
55%
(
59 of
107)
1st Serve %
48%
(
59 of
123)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
14
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
49 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
58 of
123)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Seibold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Emily Seibold
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
79%
(
92 of
117)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
50 of
92)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
117)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isabelle Cherny
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Marie Mettraux
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Emily Seibold
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Emily Seibold
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Jazmin Ortenzi
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julieta Estable
Player
Emily Seibold
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Melany Solange Krywoj
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Bhamidipaty Vs Seibold Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Emily Seibold
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
