Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sho Shimabukuro vs Jesper De Jong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shimabukuro vs Jong analysis and find out who is favored!
Sho Shimabukuro vs Jesper De Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shimabukuro has won 51.77% of points on his second serve, while Jong has won 49.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shimabukuro, in recent form, has won 53.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 52.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.04% and 32.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shimabukuro has saved 58.4% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 65.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shimabukuro has won 53.13% of matches played (W/L 34/ 30), with Jong winning 60.66% (W/L 37/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shimabukuro has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 22/ 19). Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 80/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Shimabukuro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.41% of matches (W/L 22/ 17), where as Jong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 26/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shimabukuro winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Shimabukuro winning 2 and Jong winning 0. The last match between Shimabukuro and Jong was at the Tunis Challenger, 19-05-2023, Semifinals, Clay with Sho Shimabukuro getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:44.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Shimabukuro and Jong have played a deciding set 0 times, with Shimabukuro winning 0 times and Jong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Shimabukuro winning 0, and Jong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shimabukuro has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.58 while Jong has played against players with an average rank of 318.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shimabukuro has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shimabukuro has converted 45.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 48.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shimabukuro 1 - 0 Jong
173
Rank
135
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
158
Rank
135
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
62% (214-130)
Career Total W/L
62% (216-131)
27% (4-11)
YTD W/L
57% (12-9)
$196,505
Career Prize Money
$308,595
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shimabukuro VS Jong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Sho Shimabukuro | Jesper De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:44 | 1:11:44 |
| 1st Serve % | 43% (20/47) | 53% (24/45) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (15/20) | 38% (9/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (13/27) | 43% (9/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (27/45) | 40% (19/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Shimabukuro VS Jong H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Jesper De Jong
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sho Shimabukuro | Jesper De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 27% (4/11) | 57% (12/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 35% (12/22) | 55% (27/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (152/180) | 53% (237/210) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 70% (7/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.55 |
| Aces Total | 50 | 119 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 32 | 58 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:9 | 1:47:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 345.13 | 308.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (581/1002) | 61% (885/1460) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (400/581) | 71% (626/885) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (214/421) | 49% (282/575) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (31/58) | 48% (63/131) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (310/910) | 40% (564/1405) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 80% (4/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (4/6) | 57% (8/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 27% (4/15) | 56% (10/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Sho Shimabukuro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Jea Moon Lee
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
13
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
13
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
11 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Mattia Bellucci
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
94)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
59%
(
80 of
136)
8
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
59 of
80)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
28 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
48 of
136)
125
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(2) 6-7(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Gauthier Onclin
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Jesper De Jong
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
47%
(
7 of
15)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
21
Total Points Won
8
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jan Choinski
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Jesper De Jong
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Jesper De Jong
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Shimabukuro Vs Jong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
