Prediction of Sheila Piercey Summers vs Patience Thomson Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Piercey Summers vs P. Thomson

Sheila Piercey Summers

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

106

Age

113

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Patience Thomson

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

106

Age

113

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Summers 1 - 0 Thomson

They have played 2 sets in total, with Sheila Piercey Summers winning 2 and Patience Thomson winning 0. The last match between Sheila Piercey Summers and Patience Thomson was at the Bournemouth 1, 28-04-1947, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Sheila Piercey Summers getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Summers	1
Thomson	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Bournemouth 1(04-28-47)

Stats

Sheila Piercey Summers

Patience Thomson

S. P. Summers vs P. Thomson H2H Profile

S. P. Summers	Stats	P. Thomson
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
74.29% (130-45)	Career Total W/L	50.18% (136-135)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. P. Summers vs P. Thomson Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sheila Piercey Summers has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Patience Thomson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sheila Piercey Summers, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Patience Thomson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Sheila Piercey Summers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Patience Thomson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Sheila Piercey Summers has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Patience Thomson winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Sheila Piercey Summers has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 79% (W/L 69/18), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 64% (W/L 16/9). Patience Thomson has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 79% (W/L 28/20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 39/54).
Player level: In the last year, Sheila Piercey Summers has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Patience Thomson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sheila Piercey Summers winning 1 times and Patience Thomson being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sheila Piercey Summers winning 2 and Patience Thomson winning 0.
The last match between Sheila Piercey Summers and Patience Thomson was at the Bournemouth 1, 28-04-1947, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Sheila Piercey Summers getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sheila Piercey Summers has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Patience Thomson has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sheila Piercey Summers has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Patience Thomson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Sheila Piercey Summers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Patience Thomson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Sheila Piercey Summers vs Patience Thomson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. P. Summers vs P. Thomson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. P. Summers	Stats	P. Thomson
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

S. P. Summers Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Johannesburg - 19-03-1951
F Hazel Redick SmithH. Redick	W	8-6 2-6 7-5	Stats
Port Elizabeth RSA vs USA - 19-04-1950
Robin Shirley FryS. Fry	L	5-7 6-1 6-1	Stats
Durban RSA vs USA - 15-04-1950
Robin Doris HartD. Hart	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Johannesburg - 30-03-1950
SF Shirley FryS. Fry	L	3-6 6-1 6-4	Stats
Julia WipplingerJ. Wipplinger	W	6-1 6-4	Stats

View All

P. Thomson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bristol - 11-06-1956
R3 Beatrice De ChambureB. De	W	6-0 0-6 6-4	Stats
R4 Ann JonesA. Jones	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Bournemouth - 23-04-1956
R2 Barbara HortonB. Horton	L	6-1 8-6	Stats
Menton Riviera Chps - 27-02-1956
R4 Marion Craig SmithM. Craig	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Eastbourne - 05-09-1955
R3 S C CollettS. C	L	6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

S. P. Summers vs P. Thomson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. P. Summers	Stats	P. Thomson
74.29% (130/45)	YTD Win/Loss	50.18% (136/135)
71.85% (268/105)	Sets Win/Loss	50.35% (287/283)
60.25% (1989/1312)	Games Win/Loss	49.78% (2503/2525)
75.00% (6/2)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
79.31% (69/18)	Clay Win/Loss	41.94% (39/54)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (2/3)
70.91% (39/16)	Grass Win/Loss	53.60% (67/58)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
72.00% (18/7)	Slam W/L	20.00% (2/8)
74% (125/169)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	51% (129/254)
52% (17/33)	Deciding Set Win %	53% (32/60)
91% (129/117)	1st Set Won, Won Match	91% (127/115)
9% (129/12)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	9% (127/11)
24% (42/10)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	11% (129/14)