Sekou Bangoura vs Dennis Uspensky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bangoura vs Uspensky analysis and find out who is favored!
Sekou Bangoura vs Dennis Uspensky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bangoura has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Uspensky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bangoura, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Uspensky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bangoura has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Uspensky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bangoura has won 83.33% of matches played (W/L 5/ 1), with Uspensky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bangoura has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 172/ 120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Uspensky has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 93/ 66), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Bangoura has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 83.33% of matches (W/L 5/ 1), where as Uspensky has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Bangoura winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Bangoura winning 4 and Uspensky winning 2. The last match between Bangoura and Uspensky was at the USA F9, 23-02-2015, First, Clay with Dennis Uspensky getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bangoura and Uspensky have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bangoura winning 0 times and Uspensky 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bangoura winning 0, and Uspensky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bangoura has played against opponents with an average rank of 215.83 while Uspensky has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bangoura has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Uspensky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bangoura has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Uspensky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bangoura 2 - 1 Uspensky
10
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
10
Minor
892
Rank
213
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
2
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
629
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (408-333)
Career Total W/L
57% (125-96)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$37,170
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sekou Bangoura | Dennis Uspensky |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
Games Won | 31 | 26 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 | |||||
6-2 6-3 | |||||
6-4 7-5 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sekou Bangoura | Dennis Uspensky |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sekou Bangoura Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Arvid Nordquist
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Lorenzo Claverie
69%
(
68 of
99)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
97)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Aidan Kim
Player
Sekou Bangoura
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Nathan Ponwith
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Jaycer Lyeons
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kyle Kang
Player
Sekou Bangoura
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cooper Williams
Player
Sekou Bangoura
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Sekou Bangoura
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
56 of
73)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Dennis Uspensky Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Niklas Schell
Player
Dennis Uspensky
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Dennis Uspensky
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
16
Total Points Won
8
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dennis Uspensky
Player
Gunjan Jadhav
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Dennis Uspensky
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dennis Uspensky
Player
Muthu Senthilkumar
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
0
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Fermin Tenti
Player
Dennis Uspensky
84%
(
112 of
134)
1st Serve %
60%
(
74 of
124)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
56%
(
63 of
112)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
59 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
56 of
124)
131
Total Points Won
127
|
7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dennis Uspensky
Player
Amr Elsayed
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
0
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dennis Uspensky
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dennis Uspensky
Player
Manfred Fellin
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more