Sebastian Gima vs Dominik Kellovsky Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 25 Jun at 09:36 AM UTC

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Gima vs D. Kellovsky

Sebastian Gima

ROU

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

561

C. Rank

604

436

Best Rank

468

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Dominik Kellovsky

CZE

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

561

C. Rank

604

436

Best Rank

468

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Gima 2 - 1 Kellovsky

They have played 8 sets in total, with Sebastian Gima winning 5 and Dominik Kellovsky winning 3. The last match between Sebastian Gima and Dominik Kellovsky was at the M25 Targu Mures, 25-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Sebastian Gima getting the victory 6-4 2-6 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Gima	2
Kellovsky	1

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R2) M25 Targu Mures(06-25-25)

Stats

Sebastian Gima

Dominik Kellovsky

(QF) M15 Antalya(03-15-24)

Stats

Dominik Kellovsky

Sebastian Gima

(R1) M15 Sozopol(10-05-22)

Stats

Sebastian Gima

Dominik Kellovsky

S. Gima vs D. Kellovsky H2H Profile

S. Gima	Stats	D. Kellovsky
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
56.65% (230-176)	Career Total W/L	55.67% (314-250)
1	Clay	1
1	Hard	0
1	Titles	1
2	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. Gima vs D. Kellovsky Match Preview:

Gima has recently won 41.01% of points on their second serve, while Kellovsky has secured 45.02% in the same area.
For returning their opponent's second serve, Gima shows a slight edge with 49.74% compared to Kellovsky’s 47.84%.
In dealing with first serve returns, Gima again leads with 30.92% against Kellovsky’s 27.15%.
Gima excels slightly in breakpoint saving, achieving a 52.89% rate, narrowly surpassing Kellovsky’s 50.75%.
In the past year, Kellovsky has a higher match win rate at 62.86% compared to Gima's 51.56%.
Hard is the best surface for both players: Gima maintains a 60% win rate, and Kellovsky comes close with 58%.
On the Futures/Satellites/ITF circuit, Kellovsky has outperformed Gima, winning 69.09% of his matches compared to Gima’s 54.72%.
Both have faced each other twice, with each winning once, and Gima dominating in sets won at 3-2.
Does the match duration between them reveal anything? The average match time is 2:19:30, which is quite balanced.
Kellovsky has the upper hand in deciding sets, having won the only deciding set between them.
Kellovsky's recent opponent quality indicates a higher level at an average rank of 363.67, better than Gima’s 425.09.
In break point conversion, Kellovsky leads 37.36% to Gima’s 34.75%, indicating better opportunities under pressure.

Editorial Prediction (June 25, 2025, UTC):

Recent statistics provide insight into this matchup, showing a mixed picture in performance metrics. Gima excels in returning both first and second serves, which could be crucial.

Kellovsky, however, shows while having a better second serve points won, slightly higher breakpoint conversion, and a more impressive overall win rate in the last year.

The deciding factor may be Kellovsky’s recent robustness in facing stronger opponents and his consistent performance in deciding sets.

Based on these considerations, Kellovsky appears to be the more likely winner in this upcoming match, especially if it comes down to tight situations.

Sebastian Gima vs Dominik Kellovsky Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Gima vs D. Kellovsky H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Gima	Stats	D. Kellovsky
2	H2H Matches Won	1
5	Sets Won	3
41	Games Won	37
3	Aces (Total)	6
7	Total Double Faults	14
2:28:57	Average Match Time	2:28:57
66% (173/262)	1st Serve %	61% (156/255)
60% (104/173)	1st Serve Win %	63% (98/156)
48% (43/89)	2nd Serve Win %	40% (40/99)
44% (14/32)	Break Pts Won %	36% (12/33)
46% (117/255)	Return Points Win %	44% (115/262)
67% (2/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	33% (1/3)
50% (1/2)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (1/2)
67% (2/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
33% (1/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	33% (1/3)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Gima Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Guayaquil Challenger - 17-11-2025
R1 Andres AndradeA. Andrade	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
M25 Manzanillo - 10-11-2025
SF Alan Fernando Rubio FierrosA. Fernando	L	6-4 6-7(5) 6-4	Stats
QF Viktor MarkovV. Markov	W	6-2 3-6 6-3	Stats
R2 Kyle SeeligK. Seelig	W	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats
R1 Alan Raul Sau FrancoA. Raul	W	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

D. Kellovsky Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Soma Bay Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Charlie RobertsonC. Robertson	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
R1 Petr Bar BiryukovP. Bar	W	7-6(4) 7-6(3)	Stats
Q3 Ivan NedelkoI. Nedelko	W	6-7(4) 6-0 6-2	Stats
Q1 Edison AmbarzumjanE. Ambarzumjan	W	7-5 6-2	Stats
M15 Heraklion - 29-09-2025
R2 Daniel Salazar MartinezD. Salazar	L	3-6 6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

S. Gima vs D. Kellovsky Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Gima	Stats	D. Kellovsky
56.65% (230/176)	YTD Win/Loss	55.67% (314/250)
54.97% (509/417)	Sets Win/Loss	54.01% (700/596)
52.07% (4475/4119)	Games Win/Loss	52.05% (6419/5914)
61.00% (61/39)	Hard Win/Loss	58.18% (128/92)
55.59% (164/131)	Clay Win/Loss	53.64% (162/140)
45.45% (5/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	57.14% (24/18)
0.16	Aces Per Game	0.25
660	Aces Total	1476
0.25	Double Faults Per Game	0.23
1059	Total Double Faults	1405
1:33:4	Average Match Time	1st Match
445.64	Average Opponent Rank	461.23
59% (14301/24332)	1st Serve %	62% (17011/27374)
65% (9330/14301)	1st Serve Win %	69% (11684/17011)
49% (4887/10031)	2nd Serve Win %	45% (4708/10362)
44% (1273/2864)	Break Points Won % (Total)	44% (1221/2802)
43% (10808/25079)	Return Points Win %	41% (11058/27061)
42.25% (30/41)	Challenger W/L	35.38% (23/42)
59.70% (200/135)	Futures W/L	58.32% (291/208)
56% (226/400)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (310/559)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (1/2)
56% (58/104)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (81/159)
55% (65/118)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (94/169)
91% (214/195)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (298/260)
9% (214/19)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (298/38)
18% (192/34)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (266/53)