Sean Hess vs Taj Hibbert Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 May at 11:17 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Hess vs T. Hibbert

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hess 1 - 0 Hibbert
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sean Hess winning 2 and Taj Hibbert winning 0. The last match between Sean Hess and Taj Hibbert was at the M15 Kursumlijska Banja, 27-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Sean Hess getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hess | 1 |
| Hibbert | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M15 Kursumlijska Banja(05-27-25)
S. Hess vs T. Hibbert H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.02% (149-117) | Career Total W/L | 42.86% (6-8) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Hess vs T. Hibbert Match Preview:
- Is second serve success a crucial factor in this match? Hess has shown superior second serve performance recently, winning 40.47% of points, compared to Hibbert's 0%.
- Regarding return games, Hess dominates, having won 51.21% of their opponent's second serve points and 31.05% on first serve returns. Hibbert, however, has not won any points in these categories.
- An analysis of breakpoints saved indicates Hess has the edge, with a 45.87% success rate, whereas Hibbert has saved no breakpoints recently.
- In the past year, Hess has a balanced match record of 50% wins (22/22), while Hibbert boasts a higher win rate of 60% (3/2), though with fewer matches played.
- Which player excels on clay? Hess has a slightly better career win rate on clay (56%) compared to Hibbert (50%).
- In terms of event level, both players have mostly competed in similar tiers, but Hibbert’s win percentage is slightly superior at the $10K level.
- The quality of opponents faced favors Hess, who has played against players with an average rank of 209.64, much stronger than Hibbert, who hasn’t faced ranked opponents recently.
- In deciding sets, Hibbert has been flawless, winning 100% of such scenarios, while Hess has struggled, winning only 19%.
- Key for in-game strategy, Hess converts 37.04% of breakpoints, while Hibbert has yet to convert one of these opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (May 26, 2025, UTC):
Both players have shown unique strengths and weaknesses in their recent performances. Hess’s prowess on second serves and in return games gives him a clear tactical advantage. His ability to save breakpoints further adds to his strategic arsenal.
Although Hibbert’s overall match win record appears slightly better, the low level of competition he has faced may skew these results. Additionally, Hibbert’s perfection in deciding sets might suggest a potential edge in high-stakes situations.
Nonetheless, the consistent strength demonstrated by Hess across multiple match facets indicates a significant edge. Based on these considerations, Hess seems the likely winner in the upcoming match.
Sean Hess vs Taj Hibbert Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Hess vs T. Hibbert H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:39:35 | Average Match Time | 1:39:35 |
| 63% (40/64) | 1st Serve % | 66% (42/64) |
| 73% (29/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (24/42) |
| 50% (12/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
| 48% (31/64) | Return Points Win % | 36% (23/64) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Hess Recent Matches Played
T. Hibbert Recent Matches Played

S. Hess vs T. Hibbert Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.02% (149/117) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 56.54% (337/259) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.16% (14/17) |
| 53.25% (2975/2612) | Games Win/Loss | 50.66% (153/149) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 56.37% (146/113) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 152 | Aces Total | 5 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 529 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 274.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 55.93 |
| 63% (5960/9502) | 1st Serve % | 74% (176/238) |
| 61% (3649/5960) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (103/176) |
| 44% (1576/3542) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (32/62) |
| 47% (493/1058) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (6/20) |
| 43% (4060/9382) | Return Points Win % | 35% (79/228) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.92% (148/112) | Futures W/L | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 55% (144/261) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (6/14) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (21/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 36% (24/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 84% (163/137) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 71% (7/5) |
| 16% (163/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 29% (7/2) |
| 12% (103/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (7/1) |