Scott Griekspoor vs Daniel Entelis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Griekspoor vs Entelis analysis and find out who is favored!
Scott Griekspoor vs Daniel Entelis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Griekspoor has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Entelis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Griekspoor, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Entelis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Griekspoor has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Entelis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Griekspoor has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Entelis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Griekspoor has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 95/ 48), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 111/ 84). Entelis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 24% (W/L 12/ 38).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Griekspoor winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Griekspoor winning 2 and Entelis winning 0. The last match between Griekspoor and Entelis was at the Israel F17 (Tiberias), 05-12-2017, First, Hard with Scott Griekspoor getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Griekspoor and Entelis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Griekspoor winning 0 times and Entelis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Griekspoor winning 0, and Entelis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Griekspoor has played against opponents with an average rank of while Entelis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Griekspoor has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Entelis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Griekspoor has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Entelis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Griekspoor 1 - 0 Entelis
13
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
12
Minor
Ret.
Rank
205
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
61% (260-169)
Career Total W/L
25% (14-43)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,105
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Griekspoor VS Entelis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Scott Griekspoor | Daniel Entelis |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 0:53:0 | 0:53:0 |
1st Serve % | 71% (39/55) | 56% (24/43) |
1st Serve Win% | 67% (26/39) | 50% (12/24) |
2nd Serve Win% | 69% (11/16) | 53% (10/19) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/3) |
Return Points W% | 49% (21/43) | 33% (18/55) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Griekspoor VS Entelis H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Daniel Entelis
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Scott Griekspoor | Daniel Entelis |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Scott Griekspoor Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Evan Furness
Player
Scott Griekspoor
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Scott Griekspoor
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Carlos Gomez-Herrera
58%
(
65 of
113)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
128)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
65 of
83)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
7%
(
1 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
37 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
40 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
125
|
3-6 7-6(8) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R3 |
Louis Wessels
Player
Scott Griekspoor
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Jay Clarke
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Federico Coria
Player
Scott Griekspoor
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Gabriele Bosio
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Illya Marchenko
Player
Scott Griekspoor
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Entelis Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 3-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Scott Griekspoor
Player
Daniel Entelis
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more