Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg vs Matej Dodig Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Who performs better on the second serve in recent matches? Matej Dodig edges out with a 44.27% success rate compared to Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg's 43.34%.
• In terms of returning the opponent's second serve, Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg shows a stronger performance with 47.00% compared to Matej Dodig's 44.48%.
• When examining first serve return points, Matej Dodig has a slight advantage with 27.90%, while Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg is at 26.43%.
• How do the players handle pressure situations? Matej Dodig has saved 57.29% of breakpoints versus Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg's 53.20%.
• Overall match wins in the last year favor Matej Dodig at 51.56%, whereas Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg has won 47.06% of his matches.
• Matej Dodig excels on Hard surfaces with a 68% win rate, but struggles more on I.hard at 57%. Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg's best results come on I.hard, also at 68%, but he flounders on Grass surfaces, winning only 25%.
• Both players primarily compete at the Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K. Matej Dodig holds a slight edge with a win rate of 51.79%, compared to Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg's 49.12%.
• In terms of opponent quality, Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg has faced tougher opponents, averaging a rank of 319.54 vs. Matej Dodig's 338.69.
• In deciding sets, Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg wins 45% of the time, surpassing Matej Dodig's 40% success rate in such situations.

Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):

When considering recent second serve performance, although close, Matej Dodig has a slight advantage over Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg. On the other hand, Wayenburg appears stronger in return games, both on second and first serves.

In pressure situations, Dodig seems more reliable at saving breakpoints, which could influence critical moments of the match.

Over the course of the last year, Dodig has been marginally more successful overall, but Wayenburg's record against tougher opponents might give him an edge in resilience.

Both players have specific surface preferences, with Dodig excelling on Hard and Wayenburg on I.hard. The surface of the upcoming match will be a determining factor based on these statistics.

Given the slight advantages each player holds in different aspects, Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg seems likely to leverage his strengths on the return games and against tougher opponents to win this match.