Santiago Gonzalez vs Marcel Felder Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gonzalez vs Felder analysis and find out who is favored!
Santiago Gonzalez vs Marcel Felder Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gonzalez has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Felder has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gonzalez, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Felder has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gonzalez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Felder has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gonzalez has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Felder winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gonzalez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 147/ 110), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 11/ 22). Felder has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 10/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gonzalez winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Gonzalez winning 4 and Felder winning 1. The last match between Gonzalez and Felder was at the Salinas Challenger, 11-01-2010, First, Hard with Santiago Gonzalez getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gonzalez and Felder have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gonzalez winning 1 times and Felder 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gonzalez winning 0, and Felder 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gonzalez has played against opponents with an average rank of while Felder has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gonzalez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Felder has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gonzalez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Felder has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gonzalez 2 - 0 Felder
7
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Ret.
Rank
155
High
41
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
227
High
39
Age
R
Plays
16
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
16
Minor
Form
51% (269-254)
Career Total W/L
62% (400-250)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$53,515
Career Prize Money
$590
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Santiago Gonzalez | Marcel Felder |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
Games Won | 27 | 18 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | |||||
6-2 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Santiago Gonzalez | Marcel Felder |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Santiago Gonzalez Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Hugo Nys
Player
Santiago Gonzalez
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Santiago Gonzalez
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
12
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Emilio Gomez
Player
Santiago Gonzalez
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Santiago Gonzalez
Player
Ante Pavic
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Santiago Gonzalez
Player
Andrea Arnaboldi
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Luca Vanni
Player
Santiago Gonzalez
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Santiago Gonzalez
Player
Roy Hobbs
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alexandre Sidorenko
Player
Santiago Gonzalez
45%
(
19 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Filippo Leonardi
Player
Santiago Gonzalez
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Philipp Oswald
Player
Santiago Gonzalez
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Marcel Felder Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Mateo Nicolas Martinez
Player
Marcel Felder
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Marcel Felder
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Marcel Felder
Player
Alejandro Mendoza
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Pavel Krainik
Player
Marcel Felder
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
11
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
47 of
78)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
111)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hans Hach Verdugo
Player
Marcel Felder
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
95
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Raheel Manji
Player
Marcel Felder
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
91)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marcel Felder
Player
Maxwell Mendelsohn
86%
(
44 of
51)
1st Serve %
35%
(
16 of
46)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Marcel Felder
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
80%
(
37 of
46)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
20 of
20)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
3 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 | 6-4 1-6 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
R1 |
Marcel Felder
Player
Henry Choi
79%
(
63 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H |
view more