Sandro Kopp vs Roberto Carballes Baena Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Over the recent six months, Kopp has demonstrated a better second serve with 48.43% of points won, compared to Baena's 46.07%. How could this impact the match outcome? Second serve performance often aligns closely with match wins, giving Kopp a slight edge.
• Return Game Stats: When it comes to returning opponents' second serves, Baena outperforms Kopp, winning 48.83% versus Kopp’s 43.35%. Could this give Baena the upper hand? Their stronger return game suggests potential dominance in rallies.
• Under Pressure: Baena has shown superior ability in saving breakpoints at 58.97%, higher than Kopp's 51.33%. What does this reveal? It indicates Baena may have the mental fortitude to handle crucial game points effectively.
• Performance Overview: Kopp holds a higher win rate in the past year, securing 62.82% of matches, while Baena lagged behind at 44%. Is this a decisive factor? Kopp's consistent year-long performance suggests a favorable outlook.
• Surface Proficiency: Both players excel on clay, with Baena slightly ahead at a 62% win rate, compared to Kopp's 60%. Could the surface decide the winner? It could, but it's a slight advantage for Baena.
• Player Level: Kopp has mainly competed at lower-tier events, with a 70.83% win rate, whereas Baena contested higher-level events with a 40% success rate. Does this influence the prediction? The level of play each has faced may factor into their resilience against tougher opponents.
• Opponent Quality: Baena has consistently faced higher-ranked players (average rank of 128.58) compared to Kopp's 367.06. Could this experience prove advantageous? It indicates Baena is more accustomed to high-stakes matches.
• Deciding Set Performance: In potential deciding scenarios, Kopp excels with a 68% win rate, over Baena’s 44%. How significant is this statistic? It could be crucial in tightly contested matches.
• Break Point Conversion: Recently, Kopp has been slightly better at converting break points at 33.94%, compared to Baena's 31.71%. Does it guarantee success? Not solely, but it suggests Kopp's slight efficiency edge in pivotal moments.

Editorial Prediction (September 18, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match showcases a contrast in strengths, with Kopp having a slightly better overall win record in the past year, coupled with a more effective second serve performance.

However, Baena's superior return game and ability to save breakpoints testify to their resilience under pressure. Their higher exposure to top-ranked opponents also suggests better preparedness for tough matches.

Considering these elements, while Kopp often performs well in deciding sets, Baena's robustness in key aspects like returns and pressure might give them a subtle advantage.

Ultimately, the prediction leans slightly toward Baena as the likely winner, thanks to their stronger performance in crucial areas, despite Kopp's consistency over the past year.