Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sandra Samir vs Verena Meliss Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Samir vs Meliss analysis and find out who is favored!
Sandra Samir vs Verena Meliss Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Samir has won 48.58% of points on his second serve, while Meliss has won 40.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Samir, in recent form, has won 57.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Meliss has won 58.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.2% and 44.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Samir has saved 50.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Meliss has saved 50.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Samir has won 65.79% of matches played (W/L 50/ 26), with Meliss winning 55.77% (W/L 29/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Samir has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 198/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3). Meliss has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 140/ 161).
- Player level: In the last year, Samir has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.47% of matches (W/L 40/ 13), where as Meliss has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 15/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Samir winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Samir winning 4 and Meliss winning 1. The last match between Samir and Meliss was at the W25 Getxo, 10-07-2019, First, Clay with Sandra Samir getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Samir and Meliss have played a deciding set 1 times, with Samir winning 1 times and Meliss 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Samir winning 0, and Meliss 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Samir has played against opponents with an average rank of 137.79 while Meliss has played against players with an average rank of 191.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Samir has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Meliss has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Samir has converted 50.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Meliss has converted 55.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Samir 2 - 0 Meliss
531
Rank
342
High
26
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
691
Rank
487
High
26
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
64% (429-245)
Career Total W/L
48% (193-213)
72% (21-8)
YTD W/L
60% (15-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sandra Samir | Verena Meliss |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 30 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:28:0 | 2:28:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (93/166) | 68% (107/158) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (57/93) | 53% (57/107) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (37/73) | 43% (22/51) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 68% (13/19) | 47% (9/19) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (79/158) | 43% (72/166) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 5-7 6-2 |
Stats 
Sandra Samir
Player
Verena Meliss
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Verena Meliss
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sandra Samir | Verena Meliss |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 72% (21/8) | 60% (15/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 68% (45/21) | 58% (32/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (348/263) | 56% (279/218) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (18/6) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 61% (14/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 53 | 47 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.57 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 139 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:14 | 1:45:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 183.45 | 183 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (1051/1890) | 64% (1025/1591) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (647/1051) | 62% (638/1025) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (404/839) | 40% (227/566) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (138/273) | 56% (119/214) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (925/1874) | 49% (753/1527) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 53% (8/7) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (18/5) | 70% (7/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (21/29) | 58% (14/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (24/21) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (24/3) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Sandra Samir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Bella Bergkvist Larsson
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Sandra Samir
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Jenna Dean
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julie Struplova
Player
Sandra Samir
79%
(
68 of
86)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
50%
(
43 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Denislava Glushkova
63%
(
74 of
117)
1st Serve %
80%
(
83 of
104)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
39%
(
29 of
74)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
58%
(
11 of
19)
Break Points Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
61%
(
71 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
60 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Sandra Samir
48%
(
32 of
67)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Ella Mcdonald
47%
(
17 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Katarina Kuzmova
Player
Sandra Samir
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Liisa Varul
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Verena Meliss Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Doga Turkmen
60%
(
72 of
121)
1st Serve %
73%
(
82 of
112)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
37%
(
18 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
49%
(
59 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
112)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Verena Meliss
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Martina Spigarelli
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve %
65%
(
11 of
17)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
13 of
17)
25
Total Points Won
6
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federica Di Sarra
Player
Verena Meliss
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Verena Meliss
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Valeria Kravchenko
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anne Schaefer
Player
Verena Meliss
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Julia Ronney
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oana Gavrila
Player
Verena Meliss
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
55%
(
63 of
114)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
16
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
114)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Samir Vs Meliss Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sandra Samir
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Verena Meliss
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
