Samir Hamza Reguig vs Yannik Kelm Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Samir Hamza Reguig and Yannik Kelm exhibit minimal differences in second serve performance, with Reguig winning 41.63% of points compared to Kelm’s 41.54%. Does this slight edge give Reguig an advantage? Perhaps not, as the difference is negligible.
• In return games, Kelm surpasses Reguig, winning 50% of opponent's second serve points against 47.07% for Reguig. For first serve returns, Kelm also leads slightly with 31.60% compared to Reguig’s 30.38%.
• Under pressure during breakpoints, Kelm slightly outperforms Reguig, saving 45.86% of breakpoints compared to Reguig’s 45.52%.
• Over the past year, Kelm boasts a stronger match-winning percentage at 57.89%, while Reguig's results stand at 45.16%.
• On their best surfaces, Reguig excels on clay with a 52% win rate, while Kelm’s strength is on hard courts, winning 52% of his matches there. Could surface play a crucial role? Yes, matching the player to the surface is key.
• Both players accumulated their most experience in Futures/ITF tournaments, with Kelm achieving a higher success rate of 57.89% compared to Reguig's 49.12%.
• Reguig has faced opponents with an average ranking of 309.03, while Kelm has competed against higher-ranked players averaging 194.46, indicating Kelm's greater exposure to tougher competition.
• Reguig holds a slight margin in deciding set performance with a 55% win rate, compared to Kelm’s 54%.
• When it comes to breakpoint conversion, Kelm again leads Reguig slightly, converting 38.71% of opportunities against Reguig’s 35.48%.

Editorial Prediction (November 14, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match exhibits close second serve statistics between Samir Hamza Reguig and Yannik Kelm, yet Kelm's slight edge in return games may provide him with pivotal opportunities to seize momentum.

Analyzing the players under pressure, Kelm's performance in saving breakpoints indicates a marginal advantage that could prove crucial. Furthermore, his superior win percentage over the last year suggests better form and consistency.

The impact of surface prowess highlights an intriguing dynamic: if the match unfolds on a hard court, Kelm’s history suggests an added edge, potentially tipping the scales further in his favor.

Overall, considering recent form, opponent quality, and surface compatibility, Yannik Kelm appears poised as the likely victor in this imminent encounter.