Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Samantha Crawford vs Chiara Scholl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Crawford vs Scholl analysis and find out who is favored!
Samantha Crawford vs Chiara Scholl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Crawford has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Scholl has won 35.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Crawford, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Scholl has won 49.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Crawford has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Scholl has saved 25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Crawford has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 7/ 8), with Scholl winning 47.5% (W/L 19/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Crawford has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 70/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10). Scholl has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 293/ 219), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Crawford has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.36% of matches (W/L 4/ 7), where as Scholl has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 16/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Crawford winning 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Crawford winning 5 and Scholl winning 3. The last match between Crawford and Scholl was at the W60 Orlando, 23-05-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Samantha Crawford getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:38:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Crawford and Scholl have played a deciding set 2 times, with Crawford winning 1 times and Scholl 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Crawford winning 1, and Scholl 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Crawford has played against opponents with an average rank of 179.07 while Scholl has played against players with an average rank of 268.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Crawford has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Scholl has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Crawford has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Scholl has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Crawford 2 - 1 Scholl
875
Rank
98
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
578
Rank
164
High
31
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
52% (178-162)
Career Total W/L
55% (436-359)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (1-1)
$252,591
Career Prize Money
$18,348
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Samantha Crawford | Chiara Scholl |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 3 |
| Games Won | 48 | 40 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:38:40 | 0:38:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (58/85) | 49% (39/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (45/58) | 72% (28/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 26% (7/27) | 49% (20/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (32/80) | 39% (33/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(2) 10-5 |
Stats 
Samantha Crawford
Player
Chiara Scholl
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
26%
(
7 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 6-2 7-5 | |||||
| 3-6 6-3 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Samantha Crawford | Chiara Scholl |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (14/18) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.73 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 141 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 46% (48/104) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (31/48) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (22/56) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (36/86) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Samantha Crawford Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tori Kinard
Player
Samantha Crawford
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
7
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
17 of
21)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
45
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ganna Poznikhirenko
Player
Samantha Crawford
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Samantha Crawford
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samantha Crawford
Player
Mai Hontama
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Samantha Crawford
Player
Carolyn Ansari
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Samantha Crawford
Player
Ivana Corley
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
34%
(
12 of
35)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dalayna Hewitt
Player
Samantha Crawford
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
17
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Samantha Crawford
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Miroshnichenko
Player
Samantha Crawford
76%
(
79 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
90)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fangran Tian
Player
Samantha Crawford
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Chiara Scholl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Stephanie Wagner
Player
Chiara Scholl
42%
(
14 of
33)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chiara Scholl
Player
Viktorie Hazmukova
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
47%
(
25 of
53)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Chiara Scholl
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Chiara Scholl
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
12
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastianna Scilipoti
Player
Chiara Scholl
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
12 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
44
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 1-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chiara Scholl
Player
Raquel Ducet Teixeira
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Chiara Scholl
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Chiara Scholl
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve %
50%
(
13 of
26)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
11 of
14)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
34
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Stusek
Player
Chiara Scholl
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chiara Scholl
Player
Luisina Giovannini
53%
(
56 of
105)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Crawford Vs Scholl Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
