Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sam Querrey vs Janko Tipsarevic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Querrey vs Tipsarevic analysis and find out who is favored!
Sam Querrey vs Janko Tipsarevic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Querrey has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Tipsarevic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Querrey, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tipsarevic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Querrey has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tipsarevic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Querrey has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Tipsarevic winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Querrey has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 81/ 50), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 67/ 73). Tipsarevic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 166/ 113), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 46/ 37).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 8 times before with Querrey winning 4 times. They have played 23 sets in total, with Querrey winning 11 and Tipsarevic winning 12. The last match between Querrey and Tipsarevic was at the US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston, 12-04-2019, Quarterfinals, Clay with Sam Querrey getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:41.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Querrey and Tipsarevic have played a deciding set 3 times, with Querrey winning 2 times and Tipsarevic 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 10 tiebreaks against each other with Querrey winning 5, and Tipsarevic 5.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Querrey has played against opponents with an average rank of while Tipsarevic has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Querrey has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tipsarevic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Querrey has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tipsarevic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Querrey 4 - 4 Tipsarevic
529
Rank
11
High
36
Age
R
Plays
4
Total4
3
Hard3
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
8
High
39
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
56% (483-375)
Career Total W/L
58% (514-365)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$7,761,555
Career Prize Money
$4,154,569
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Querrey VS Tipsarevic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Sam Querrey | Janko Tipsarevic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 4 |
| Sets Won | 11 | 12 |
| Games Won | 124 | 129 |
| Aces (Total) | 128 | 82 |
| DFs (Total) | 47 | 21 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:41 | 1:52:41 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (415/769) | 56% (438/782) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (338/415) | 79% (345/438) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (181/354) | 58% (199/344) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (13/49) | 33% (14/43) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (238/782) | 33% (250/769) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 50% (5/10) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 60% (5/3) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 40% (5/2) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 40% (5/2) |
Querrey VS Tipsarevic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Sam Querrey
Player
Janko Tipsarevic
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
23
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
44 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-7(0) 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Janko Tipsarevic
Player
Sam Querrey
47%
(
70 of
150)
1st Serve %
47%
(
62 of
133)
17
Aces
18
11
Double Faults
15
83%
(
58 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
50%
(
40 of
80)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
52 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
55 of
133)
153
Total Points Won
130
|
||||
| 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Janko Tipsarevic
Player
Sam Querrey
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
15
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
40 of
46)
71%
(
29 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
24%
(
23 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| 2-6 6-4 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats
Janko Tipsarevic
Player
Sam Querrey
62%
(
71 of
114)
1st Serve %
49%
(
60 of
123)
13
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
8
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
30%
(
34 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
43 of
123)
123
Total Points Won
114
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Janko Tipsarevic
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats
Janko Tipsarevic
Player
Sam Querrey
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
16
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
31 of
37)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
6 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 6-7(3) 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Janko Tipsarevic
58%
(
69 of
119)
1st Serve %
49%
(
57 of
116)
19
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
52%
(
26 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
32%
(
38 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
39 of
116)
120
Total Points Won
115
|
||||
| 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Janko Tipsarevic
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
19
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
44 of
56)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sam Querrey | Janko Tipsarevic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sam Querrey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Sam Querrey
58%
(
74 of
128)
1st Serve %
61%
(
88 of
145)
13
Aces
19
5
Double Faults
18
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
68 of
88)
57%
(
31 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
17 of
57)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
32%
(
41 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
60 of
145)
147
Total Points Won
126
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andy Murray
Player
Sam Querrey
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
39%
(
15 of
38)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Sam Querrey
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
7
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
19 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Sam Querrey
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
6
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
17%
(
11 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Sam Querrey
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
6
Aces
19
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
37 of
42)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Thomas Fabbiano
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
18
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
100%
(
38 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Sam Querrey
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
5
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
24%
(
20 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
19 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Querrey
Player
Robin Haase
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Janko Tipsarevic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yuichi Sugita
Player
Janko Tipsarevic
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
84 of
139)
5
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
59 of
84)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
58 of
139)
126
Total Points Won
119
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Janko Tipsarevic
Player
Fabio Fognini
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Janko Tipsarevic
Player
Corentin Moutet
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Janko Tipsarevic
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 3-6 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Janko Tipsarevic
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
79 of
130)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
50 of
79)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
30 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
56 of
130)
129
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Janko Tipsarevic
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kevin Anderson
Player
Janko Tipsarevic
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
64%
(
89 of
138)
24
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
65 of
74)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
58 of
89)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
24 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
53 of
138)
140
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Janko Tipsarevic
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
65%
(
113 of
174)
1st Serve %
64%
(
100 of
156)
17
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
83 of
113)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
64 of
100)
48%
(
29 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
36%
(
62 of
174)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
60 of
156)
172
Total Points Won
158
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Player
Janko Tipsarevic
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Janko Tipsarevic
67%
(
91 of
136)
1st Serve %
60%
(
87 of
146)
12
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
68 of
91)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
55 of
87)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
35%
(
47 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
63 of
146)
152
Total Points Won
130
|
6-3 6-0 3-6 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Querrey Vs Tipsarevic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
