Salma Drugdova vs Anna Lena Ebster Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Jul at 11:15 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Drugdova vs A. Lena Ebster

SVK
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Drugdova 1 - 0 Ebster
They have played 2 sets in total, with Salma Drugdova winning 2 and Anna Lena Ebster winning 0. The last match between Salma Drugdova and Anna Lena Ebster was at the W15 Krsko, 17-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Salma Drugdova getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Drugdova | 1 |
| Ebster | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Krsko(07-17-25)
S. Drugdova vs A. L. Ebster H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.03% (93-76) | Career Total W/L | 47.01% (55-62) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Drugdova vs A. L. Ebster Match Preview:
- Over the past six months, Drugdova has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 38.56% of points compared to Ebster's 35.82%. Could this impact the outcome?
- Both players have similar efficiency in returning first serves, with Ebster at 38.17% and Drugdova at 37.64%.
- Drugdova outperforms Ebster in returning second serves, capturing 51.76% of points, while Ebster secures 50.79%.
- Under pressure, Drugdova is stronger, saving 48.77% of breakpoints compared to Ebster's 37.19%. How might this influence pressure situations?
- Looking at the past year’s overall performance, Drugdova has a superior win rate at 58.82%, while Ebster is at 53.49%.
- On hard surfaces, both players excel, but Drugdova slightly leads with a 63% win rate versus Ebster's 60%.
- In terms of competition level, Ebster has faced opponents with a higher average ranking of 138.14, while Drugdova's opponents averaged 346.27. What does this say about their resilience?
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Drugdova holds the advantage, winning 62% of such sets, whereas Ebster wins 42%.
- Drugdova has a much higher breakpoint conversion rate of 46.67%, compared to Ebster's 37.74%, hinting at greater efficiency during crucial moments.
Editorial Prediction (July 17, 2025, UTC):
When evaluating the two players, several key statistics stand out that could determine the winner. Drugdova's superiority in saving breakpoints and converting breakpoint opportunities positions her as a formidable opponent under high-pressure situations.
In addition, her recent form on the second serve and ability to win deciding sets give her an edge that could be pivotal in this matchup. Although Ebster has faced tougher opponents on average, Drugdova's consistent performance on hard surfaces and overall win percentages in the last year further enhance her credentials.
Considering these factors, it seems Drugdova is the likely favorite to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Salma Drugdova vs Anna Lena Ebster Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Drugdova vs A. L. Ebster H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:56:11 | Average Match Time | 1:56:11 |
| 52% (35/67) | 1st Serve % | 75% (52/69) |
| 66% (23/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (31/52) |
| 63% (20/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (10/17) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 41% (28/69) | Return Points Win % | 36% (24/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Drugdova Recent Matches Played
A. L. Ebster Recent Matches Played

S. Drugdova vs A. L. Ebster Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.03% (93/76) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.01% (55/62) |
| 54.24% (211/178) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.79% (124/141) |
| 52.39% (1895/1722) | Games Win/Loss | 48.81% (1185/1243) |
| 61.36% (54/34) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 52.24% (35/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.79% (51/58) |
| 28.57% (4/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 210 | Aces Total | 39 |
| 0.56 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 984 | Total Double Faults | 149 |
| 1:41:29 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 441.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 88.76 |
| 61% (6405/10572) | 1st Serve % | 72% (2236/3121) |
| 61% (3931/6405) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (1160/2236) |
| 42% (1739/4167) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (352/885) |
| 52% (728/1411) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (154/315) |
| 48% (5099/10658) | Return Points Win % | 43% (1239/2886) |
| 50.79% (32/31) | Challenger W/L | 41.67% (10/14) |
| 57.55% (61/45) | Futures W/L | 48.39% (45/48) |
| 55% (92/168) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (55/117) |
| 49% (20/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (7/14) |
| 50% (26/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (17/31) |
| 81% (94/76) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (60/50) |
| 19% (94/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (60/10) |
| 23% (75/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (57/5) |