search

Sally Peers vs Erika Sema Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peers vs Sema analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Sally Peers vs Erika Sema Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peers has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Sema has won 45.22%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peers, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sema has won 55.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 45.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Peers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sema has saved 50.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Peers has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Sema winning 56.67% (W/L 34/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Peers has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 88/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Sema has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 349/ 283), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 15/ 21).
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Peers winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Peers winning 2 and Sema winning 5. The last match between Peers and Sema was at the Clare, 27-02-2017, Q2 round, Hard with Erika Sema getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Peers and Sema have played a deciding set 1 times, with Peers winning 1 times and Sema 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Peers winning 1, and Sema 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peers has played against opponents with an average rank of while Sema has played against players with an average rank of 245.35.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peers has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sema has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Peers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sema has converted 51.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Peers 1 - 2 Sema

Sally Peers

2

Total

0

Mast

2

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

Ret.

Rank

145

High

32

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

2

1

Hard

2

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

451

Rank

114

High

35

Age

Plays

Erika Sema

11

Total

0

Mast

7

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

4

Minor

1

Total

2

1

Hard

2

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W W W W W L W W W L

Form

L W W L W W L L W L

49% (191-198)

Career Total W/L

52% (452-411)

0% (0-0)

YTD W/L

57% (8-6)

$43,670

Career Prize Money

$117,356

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Peers VS Sema H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Sally Peers Erika Sema
All H2H Matches 1 2
Sets Won 2 5
Games Won 24 38
Aces (Total) 0 0
DFs (Total) 0 0
Avg Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 33% (1/3) 67% (2/3)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 100% (2/2)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (2/0)
1st set L, W 0% (2/0) 0% (1/0)

Peers VS Sema H2h Matches played

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Sally Peers Erika Sema
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 57% (8/6)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 59% (19/13)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 57% (150/112)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 57% (8/6)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0 0.06
Aces Total 0 8
DFs per game 0 0.13
DFs Total 0 16
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1:25:17
Avg Opp Rank 0 192
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 76% (573/750)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 60% (343/573)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 49% (86/177)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 56% (54/97)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 48% (355/732)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 57% (8/6)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 57% (8/14)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 50% (1/2)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 25% (1/4)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 80% (10/8)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 20% (10/2)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (4/0)

Sally Peers Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R2
cross
Michaela Bayerlova
Player
Sally Peers
75% ( 45 of 60)
1st Serve %
50% ( 26 of 52)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
67% ( 30 of 45)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 13 of 26)
67% ( 10 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 14 of 26)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
33% ( 20 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 25 of 52)
65
Total Points Won
47
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Sally Peers
Player
Rosalie Van Der Hoek
72% ( 28 of 39)
1st Serve %
48% ( 16 of 33)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
82% ( 23 of 28)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 7 of 16)
45% ( 5 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
18% ( 3 of 17)
100% ( 5 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
28% ( 11 of 39)
Rtn Points Won
70% ( 23 of 33)
51
Total Points Won
21
W
6-1 6-0 H2H
QF
W
6-0 6-2 H2H
Q1
W
6-4 6-0 H2H
R2
cross
Barbora Krejcikova
Player
Sally Peers
80% ( 39 of 49)
1st Serve %
67% ( 32 of 48)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72% ( 28 of 39)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 15 of 32)
50% ( 5 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 5 of 16)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
33% ( 16 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 28 of 48)
61
Total Points Won
36
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Sally Peers
Player
Alicia Smith
68% ( 26 of 38)
1st Serve %
58% ( 26 of 45)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81% ( 21 of 26)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 15 of 26)
67% ( 8 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
21% ( 4 of 19)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
24% ( 9 of 38)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 26 of 45)
55
Total Points Won
28
W
6-2 6-0 H2H
Q2
W
6-0 6-1 H2H
QF
W
7-6(5) 6-2 H2H
QF
L
7-6(1) 7-6(5) H2H
Q1
W
6-3 6-1 H2H

Erika Sema Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
QF
cross
Momoko Kobori
Player
Erika Sema
60% ( 44 of 73)
1st Serve %
78% ( 49 of 63)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
57% ( 25 of 44)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 29 of 49)
45% ( 13 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 8 of 14)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
48% ( 35 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 26 of 63)
64
Total Points Won
72
L
2-6 6-4 10-8 H2H
Q2
W
6-1 6-0 H2H
Q1
cross
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Erika Sema
63% ( 31 of 49)
1st Serve %
77% ( 30 of 39)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
65% ( 20 of 31)
1st Serve Won
40% ( 12 of 30)
50% ( 9 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
11% ( 1 of 9)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
41% ( 20 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
67% ( 26 of 39)
55
Total Points Won
33
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Erika Sema
82% ( 51 of 62)
1st Serve %
88% ( 72 of 82)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61% ( 31 of 51)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 38 of 72)
73% ( 8 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
40% ( 6 of 15)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
37% ( 23 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 42 of 82)
81
Total Points Won
63
L
6-0 2-6 6-0 H2H
QF
cross
Erika Sema
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
76% ( 42 of 55)
1st Serve %
61% ( 27 of 44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
57% ( 24 of 42)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 14 of 27)
85% ( 11 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 5 of 17)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
36% ( 20 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 25 of 44)
60
Total Points Won
39
W
6-1 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Erika Sema
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
73% ( 32 of 44)
1st Serve %
67% ( 30 of 45)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69% ( 22 of 32)
1st Serve Won
40% ( 12 of 30)
58% ( 7 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 4 of 15)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
34% ( 15 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
64% ( 29 of 45)
58
Total Points Won
31
W
6-2 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Haruka Kaji
Player
Erika Sema
59% ( 35 of 59)
1st Serve %
63% ( 37 of 59)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
57% ( 20 of 35)
1st Serve Won
49% ( 18 of 37)
71% ( 17 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
37% ( 22 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 32 of 59)
69
Total Points Won
49
L
6-1 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Erika Sema
Player
Hikaru Sato
79% ( 64 of 81)
1st Serve %
53% ( 39 of 74)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
63% ( 40 of 64)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 24 of 39)
29% ( 5 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 13 of 35)
58% ( 7 of 12)
Break Points Won
40% ( 4 of 10)
44% ( 36 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 37 of 74)
82
Total Points Won
73
W
6-2 4-6 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Erika Sema
Player
Bridget Mihulka
83% ( 30 of 36)
1st Serve %
74% ( 28 of 38)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73% ( 22 of 30)
1st Serve Won
32% ( 9 of 28)
67% ( 4 of 6)
2nd Serve Won
10% ( 1 of 10)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
28% ( 10 of 36)
Rtn Points Won
74% ( 28 of 38)
54
Total Points Won
20
W
6-0 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Destanee Aiava
Player
Erika Sema
63% ( 40 of 63)
1st Serve %
80% ( 44 of 55)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
68% ( 27 of 40)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 24 of 44)
65% ( 15 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 7)
33% ( 21 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 27 of 55)
69
Total Points Won
49
L
6-1 6-2 H2H

Peers Vs Sema Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions