Sakura Hosogi vs Natalie Gaft Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Mar at 06:55 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Hosogi vs N. Gaft

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hosogi 1 - 0 Gaft
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sakura Hosogi winning 2 and Natalie Gaft winning 0. The last match between Sakura Hosogi and Natalie Gaft was at the W35 Swan Hill, 19-03-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Sakura Hosogi getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hosogi | 1 |
| Gaft | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Swan Hill(03-19-25)
S. Hosogi vs N. Gaft H2H Profile
S. Hosogi vs N. Gaft Match Preview:
The recent form in second serve performance shows Gaft winning 37.6% of points, outpacing Hosogi who secures 34.13%. This statistic holds significant predictive power for match outcomes, often correlating closely with victory likelihood.
Analyzing return game stats, Hosogi demonstrates stronger proficiency, winning 48.82% of opponents' second serve points compared to Gaft's 42.19%. First serve return stats favor Hosogi with 34.45% against Gaft's 28.92%, providing a clearer picture of the anticipated head-to-head outcome.
Examining pressure handling, Gaft has a slight edge, successfully saving 49.11% of breakpoints in recent matches, while Hosogi saves 44.1%. This provides a useful insight for live betting predictions.
In terms of overall performance, over the past year Gaft has won 36.84% of matches (7 wins and 12 losses), whereas Hosogi boasts a superior win rate of 60.29% with a record of 41 wins and 27 losses. This gives an overarching view of their competitive head-to-head prediction.
On their preferred playing surfaces, Gaft fares best on grass with a 58% win rate, but struggles on hard courts with only 25% wins. Meanwhile, Hosogi excels on grass with a 64% win rate, but is less successful on clay, winning 50% of the time.
Regarding player level, Gaft has competed primarily in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K with a win percentage of 36.84%. In comparison, Hosogi, who has participated in the same level of tournaments, achieved a better win percentage of 50.94%.
When we consider the opponent quality, Gaft's average opponent rank is 229.79, whereas Hosogi's opponents average a rank of 483.31. This is a notable factor when assessing the quality of competition each player has faced.
In deciding sets over the last 12 months, Gaft has not won any, while Hosogi has clinched victory in 50% of these sets. This is a critical statistic, especially for matches extending into deciding sets.
When it comes to break point conversion, both players display similar efficacy. Gaft converts 37.78% of breakpoint chances, closely matching Hosogi's conversion rate of 37.34%, indicating a tight contest in this regard.
Considering all statistics and analysis, Hosogi appears to be the stronger contender for the upcoming match, with superior return stats, overall win percentage, and deciding set performance tipping the scales in their favor.
Sakura Hosogi vs Natalie Gaft Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Hosogi vs N. Gaft H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:6:45 | Average Match Time | 1:6:45 |
| 69% (35/51) | 1st Serve % | 61% (33/54) |
| 74% (26/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (19/33) |
| 44% (7/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 24% (5/21) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 14% (1/7) |
| 56% (30/54) | Return Points Win % | 35% (18/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Hosogi Recent Matches Played
N. Gaft Recent Matches Played

S. Hosogi vs N. Gaft Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.61% (252/157) | YTD Win/Loss | 37.50% (12/20) |
| 59.42% (552/377) | Sets Win/Loss | 40.58% (28/41) |
| 54.43% (4565/3822) | Games Win/Loss | 45.91% (286/337) |
| 63.44% (210/121) | Hard Win/Loss | 25.00% (4/12) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 50.00% (20/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68.75% (11/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 191 | Aces Total | 50 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 1001 | Total Double Faults | 97 |
| 1:27:40 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 498.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 272.97 |
| 70% (16797/23990) | 1st Serve % | 50% (609/1214) |
| 58% (9705/16797) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (386/609) |
| 45% (3228/7193) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (230/605) |
| 50% (1765/3504) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (41/88) |
| 49% (12158/24645) | Return Points Win % | 37% (395/1081) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.30% (157/117) | Challenger W/L | 38.71% (12/19) |
| 72.52% (95/36) | Futures W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 61% (247/403) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (12/32) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (37/75) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 54% (60/111) | Deciding Set Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 91% (234/212) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 73% (15/11) |
| 9% (234/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 27% (15/4) |
| 22% (175/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (17/1) |