Sahaja Yamalapalli vs Ema Burgic Bucko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jun at 10:15 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Yamalapalli vs E. Burgic Bucko

IND
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BIH
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Yamalapalli 1 - 0 Bucko
They have played 3 sets in total, with Sahaja Yamalapalli winning 2 and Ema Burgic Bucko winning 1. The last match between Sahaja Yamalapalli and Ema Burgic Bucko was at the W35 Santo Domingo, 12-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 6-3 2-6 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Yamalapalli | 1 |
| Bucko | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Santo Domingo(06-12-25)
S. Yamalapalli vs E. B. Bucko H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $4,470 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.97% (125-111) | Career Total W/L | 61.56% (181-113) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 20.00% (1-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Yamalapalli vs E. B. Bucko Match Preview:
- Yamalapalli has shown superiority in second serve performance, winning 37.87% of points compared to Bucko's 32.49% over the last six months.
- On return games, Bucko has excelled, winning 56% of points on opponents' second serves, overshadowing Yamalapalli’s 48.76%.
- In first serve returns, Bucko continues to edge out Yamalapalli with 36.33% over 31.58%.
- Both players have nearly identical breakpoint saving abilities, with Yamalapalli at 47.89% and Bucko at 47.58%.
- Yearly match performance favors Bucko, who has a 62.26% win rate compared to Yamalapalli's 54.55%.
- Yamalapalli's strongest surface is clay (61% win rate), while Bucko performs best on hard courts (66% win rate).
- Both players have similar experience at Challengers/ITF tournaments, with Bucko having a slight edge in win percentage.
- Yamalapalli has faced tougher opponents on average, with an opponent ranking of 349.88 against Bucko's 376.4.
- In deciding sets, Bucko is significantly more successful, winning 80% compared to Yamalapalli’s 47%.
- Yamalapalli edges out in breakpoint conversion, succeeding 50% of the time, while Bucko converts 46.1%.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
This match presents an interesting contrast in strengths between Yamalapalli and Bucko. Yamalapalli holds an advantage in second serve performance, which could be pivotal if service games become competitive.
Bucko, however, showcases impressive return stats, particularly on both first and second serve points. This could trouble Yamalapalli if they are unable to hold their service games confidently.
With both saving breakpoints at a similar rate, the match might pivot on who can seize critical moments, especially if it extends to a deciding set, where Bucko has significantly outperformed Yamalapalli.
Considering current form and overall consistency, despite opponent quality being in Yamalapalli's favor, Bucko’s superior return capabilities and deciding set record suggest that Bucko is more likely to emerge victorious in this forthcoming encounter.
Sahaja Yamalapalli vs Ema Burgic Bucko Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Yamalapalli vs E. B. Bucko H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 15 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 3:25:6 | Average Match Time | 3:25:6 |
| 51% (49/97) | 1st Serve % | 62% (56/91) |
| 57% (28/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (33/56) |
| 38% (18/48) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (10/35) |
| 80% (8/10) | Break Pts Won % | 69% (9/13) |
| 53% (48/91) | Return Points Win % | 53% (51/97) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Yamalapalli Recent Matches Played
E. B. Bucko Recent Matches Played

S. Yamalapalli vs E. B. Bucko Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.97% (125/111) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.30% (179/113) |
| 53.26% (286/251) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.82% (390/273) |
| 52.22% (2507/2294) | Games Win/Loss | 54.78% (3269/2699) |
| 52.60% (101/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.80% (81/44) |
| 61.11% (22/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.25% (97/64) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 213 | Aces Total | 76 |
| 0.39 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 909 | Total Double Faults | 700 |
| 1:39:52 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 449.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 514.33 |
| 59% (8356/14143) | 1st Serve % | 65% (4222/6518) |
| 60% (5008/8356) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (2524/4222) |
| 45% (2619/5787) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (866/2295) |
| 49% (936/1900) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (487/953) |
| 48% (6672/13937) | Return Points Win % | 50% (3303/6543) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.04% (102/94) | Challenger W/L | 56.95% (86/65) |
| 66.67% (22/11) | Futures W/L | 67.88% (93/44) |
| 52% (121/231) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (177/290) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (22/39) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (28/58) |
| 43% (29/68) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (47/81) |
| 82% (134/110) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (170/155) |
| 18% (134/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (170/15) |
| 14% (102/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (122/24) |