Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sagadat Ayap vs Vadym Ursu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ayap vs Ursu analysis and find out who is favored!
Sagadat Ayap vs Vadym Ursu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ayap 1 - 0 Ursu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ayap has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ursu has won 47.6%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ayap, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ursu has won 56.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ayap has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ursu has saved 56.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ayap has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ursu winning 72.41% (W/L 63/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ayap has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 51/ 66), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 10/ 30). Ursu has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 28/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 51/ 58).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ayap winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ayap winning 2 and Ursu winning 0. The last match between Ayap and Ursu was at the Kazakhstan F7 (Shymkent), 18-09-2018, First, Clay with Sagadat Ayap getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ayap and Ursu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ayap winning 0 times and Ursu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ayap winning 0, and Ursu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ayap has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ursu has played against players with an average rank of 107.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ayap has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ursu has won 83% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ayap has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ursu has converted 51.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
886
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
344
Rank
344
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
40% (122-180)
Career Total W/L
56% (220-170)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
67% (24-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sagadat Ayap | Vadym Ursu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:0 | 1:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 81% (64/79) | 56% (37/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (35/64) | 65% (24/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (8/15) | 24% (7/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (6/13) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (35/66) | 46% (36/79) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Sagadat Ayap
Player
Vadym Ursu
81%
(
64 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
12
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sagadat Ayap | Vadym Ursu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (24/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (48/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (405/350) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 69% (22/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 107 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 156 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:48:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 203.61 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (1461/2462) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (1012/1461) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (463/1001) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 49% (128/263) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (1056/2437) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 46% (6/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 78% (18/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (22/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 78% (7/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 89% (8/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (18/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (18/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (18/6) |
Sagadat Ayap Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Grigoriy Lomakin
Player
Sagadat Ayap
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
15
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
3 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sagadat Ayap
Player
Yerassyl Yerdilda
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandr Braynin
Player
Sagadat Ayap
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve %
59%
(
13 of
22)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
23
Total Points Won
10
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandr Braynin
Player
Sagadat Ayap
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Sagadat Ayap
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-4 13-11 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Sagadat Ayap
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 6-1 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 2-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 2-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Vadym Ursu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Vadym Ursu
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Alberto Barroso Campos
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Vadym Ursu
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Vadym Ursu
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Matej Vocel
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve %
71%
(
15 of
21)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
44%
(
14 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
32
Total Points Won
21
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Evgeny Philippov
62%
(
69 of
111)
1st Serve %
71%
(
89 of
126)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
89)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
126)
124
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Ilia Simakin
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxim Mrva
Player
Vadym Ursu
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Vadym Ursu
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Marek Gengel
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
47%
(
45 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ayap Vs Ursu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
