Sabine Rutlauka vs Chloe Cleaver Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Oct at 02:56 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Rutlauka vs C. Cleaver

LAT
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Rutlauka 1 - 0 Cleaver
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sabine Rutlauka winning 2 and Chloe Cleaver winning 0. The last match between Sabine Rutlauka and Chloe Cleaver was at the W35 Birmingham, 13-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Sabine Rutlauka getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rutlauka | 1 |
| Cleaver | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Birmingham(10-13-25)
S. Rutlauka vs C. Cleaver H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 69.23% (54-24) | Career Total W/L | 33.33% (1-2) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Rutlauka vs C. Cleaver Match Preview:
- How do both players fare on their second serve in recent matches? Chloe Cleaver leads slightly, with a win rate of 41.67% on her second serve points compared to Sabine Rutlauka's 39.06%.
- Who has the edge in return games recently? Sabine Rutlauka has a higher success rate, winning 54.89% of her opponent's second serve points, while Chloe Cleaver has won 53.33%.
- In terms of first serve return points, Chloe Cleaver appears stronger, with 39.39% won compared to Sabine Rutlauka's 33.72%.
- When under pressure, Sabine manages to save 45.57% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Chloe, who saves 44.44%.
- Looking at overall match wins this year, Sabine boasts a 57.14% win rate, while Chloe stands at 50.00%.
- Examining their preferred surfaces shows Sabine is best on Hard courts (73% win rate), whereas Chloe excels on Indoor Hard (73%).
- In the last year, Sabine has gained experience against tougher competition, facing opponents ranked on average around 179, unlike Chloe, whose opponents have a lower average rank of 433.
- Neither player has clinched a deciding set victory in recent matches, suggesting endurance could be a critical factor.
- Both players have their strengths, but event-level performances heavily influence who might prevail.
Editorial Prediction (October 13, 2025, UTC):
As the match approaches, analyzing their recent form reveals Chloe Cleaver's marginal edge in both second serve performance and first serve returns, crucial metrics for predicting outcomes.
Sabine Rutlauka, however, shows strong competence in breakpoint situations and enjoys a notable advantage in terms of overall match win rates and experience against higher-ranked opponents, which can provide psychological benefits in competitive matches.
The difference in favored playing surfaces adds complexity: Sabine excels on Hard courts, while Chloe shines on Indoor Hard surfaces. But considering the broader set of skills and experience factor, Sabine Rutlauka emerges as the favorite, especially given her higher adaptability and slight superiority in handling aspirations at critical game-stages.
Therefore, Sabine Rutlauka is the likely winner of this upcoming match, bringing a blend of strategic aptitude and competitive savvy into play.
Sabine Rutlauka vs Chloe Cleaver Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Rutlauka vs C. Cleaver H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:14:31 | Average Match Time | 1:14:31 |
| 58% (31/53) | 1st Serve % | 63% (30/48) |
| 71% (22/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 64% (14/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (8/18) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (25/48) | Return Points Win % | 32% (17/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Rutlauka Recent Matches Played
C. Cleaver Recent Matches Played

S. Rutlauka vs C. Cleaver Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.23% (54/24) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 66.11% (119/61) | Sets Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 56.65% (967/740) | Games Win/Loss | 36.17% (17/30) |
| 72.88% (43/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.14% (8/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 82 | Aces Total | 3 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 193 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 399.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 587.67 |
| 59% (1891/3214) | 1st Serve % | 66% (63/96) |
| 61% (1162/1891) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (35/63) |
| 45% (592/1323) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (15/33) |
| 54% (213/396) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
| 49% (1478/3027) | Return Points Win % | 45% (50/112) |
| 60.00% (9/6) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 71.43% (45/18) | Futures W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 69% (54/78) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 40% (4/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 54% (13/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 87% (54/47) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 13% (54/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 29% (24/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |