Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sabine Lisicki vs Akgul Amanmuradova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lisicki vs Amanmuradova analysis and find out who is favored!
Sabine Lisicki vs Akgul Amanmuradova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lisicki has won 47.24% of points on his second serve, while Amanmuradova has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lisicki, in recent form, has won 53.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Amanmuradova has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.89% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lisicki has saved 68.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Amanmuradova has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lisicki has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 8/ 5), with Amanmuradova winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lisicki has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 52/ 29), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 146/ 128). Amanmuradova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 199/ 173), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 9/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Lisicki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 80% of matches (W/L 8/ 2), where as Amanmuradova has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Lisicki winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lisicki winning 3 and Amanmuradova winning 0. The last match between Lisicki and Amanmuradova was at the French Open - Paris, 23-05-2011, First, Clay with Sabine Lisicki getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:34:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lisicki and Amanmuradova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lisicki winning 0 times and Amanmuradova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lisicki winning 0, and Amanmuradova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lisicki has played against opponents with an average rank of 287.38 while Amanmuradova has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lisicki has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Amanmuradova has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lisicki has converted 52.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Amanmuradova has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lisicki 2 - 0 Amanmuradova
458
Rank
12
High
34
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
692
Rank
50
High
39
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
56% (340-264)
Career Total W/L
51% (371-359)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,519,871
Career Prize Money
$528,032
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lisicki VS Amanmuradova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Sabine Lisicki | Akgul Amanmuradova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 0 |
| Games Won | 18 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:34:30 | 0:34:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 48% (36/75) | 62% (51/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (29/36) | 47% (24/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (21/39) | 32% (10/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (8/12) | 11% (1/9) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (48/82) | 33% (25/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Lisicki VS Amanmuradova H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-4 |
Stats 
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Akgul Amanmuradova
44%
(
22 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 6-0 ret. |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Akgul Amanmuradova
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
11 of
14)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
9 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
30
Total Points Won
15
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sabine Lisicki | Akgul Amanmuradova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sabine Lisicki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nigina Abduraimova
Player
Sabine Lisicki
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
7
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Stacey Fung
50%
(
53 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
70 of
106)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
54%
(
28 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(2) 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Jamie Loeb
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
11
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Liv Hovde
48%
(
44 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
58 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
17
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
10
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Katarina Jokic
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
48%
(
46 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Simona Waltert
53%
(
55 of
104)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
7
Aces
6
16
Double Faults
10
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
48 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sabine Lisicki
Player
Maia Lumsden
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Sabine Lisicki
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
40%
(
34 of
84)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
11
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Akgul Amanmuradova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dana Shakirova
Player
Akgul Amanmuradova
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Akgul Amanmuradova
Player
Zoziya Kardava
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jazmin Ortenzi
Player
Akgul Amanmuradova
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ylona-Georgiana Ghioroaie
Player
Akgul Amanmuradova
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Akgul Amanmuradova
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Akgul Amanmuradova
Player
Anja Wildgruber
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cagla Buyukakcay
Player
Akgul Amanmuradova
77%
(
66 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Akgul Amanmuradova
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Akgul Amanmuradova
Player
Nastja Kolar
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Akgul Amanmuradova
Player
Rebeca Pereira
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
82%
(
50 of
61)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 2-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
view more
Lisicki Vs Amanmuradova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
