Ryo Tabata vs Chase Ferguson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 05:46 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Tabata vs C. Ferguson

 JPN
0
Win
Played
1
Win

 AUS
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Tabata 0 - 1 Ferguson
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ryo Tabata winning 1 and Chase Ferguson winning 2. The last match between Chase Ferguson and Ryo Tabata was at the M25 Qian Daohu, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Chase Ferguson getting the victory 6-3 5-7 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Tabata | 0 | 
| Ferguson | 1 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Qian Daohu(10-29-25)
R. Tabata vs C. Ferguson H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 44.83% (13-16) | Career Total W/L | 59.15% (97-67) | 
| 0 | Hard | 1 | 
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
R. Tabata vs C. Ferguson Match Preview:
- Ryo Tabata has a superior second serve winning rate of 46.52% compared to Chase Ferguson's 40.82% in recent months. Could this advantage influence the match outcome?
 - In return games, Ryo outshines Chase with 45.41% success on opponents' second serves, contrasted with Chase's 40.52%.
 - Ryo also leads in first serve return points, capturing 29.38%, while Chase manages 26.36%.
 - When facing breakpoints, Chase barely edges Ryo by saving 51.79% of them, compared to Ryo’s 50.77% success rate. Could Chase’s composure under pressure tilt the scales?
 - Overall match performance in the past year shows Chase Ferguson with a slightly better win percentage of 61.11%, compared to Ryo's 55.56%.
 - Both players excel on different surfaces; Ryo Tabata does best on Hard with a 52% win rate, while Chase’s peak performance is on I.hard with a 52% success rate.
 - The level of play each has faced may impact the outcome, as Chase has faced more highly ranked opponents, averaging rank 404.17 compared to Ryo's average opponent rank of 553.22.
 - If this match reaches a deciding set, Chase again holds the advantage, winning 69% of such sets compared to Ryo’s 57% success rate.
 
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance trends, Ryo Tabata demonstrates a stronger second serve success rate, an advantageous factor linked to match projections. Additionally, Ryo exhibits superior return game statistics, reflecting a strategic edge.
Despite this, Chase Ferguson has shown proficiency under pressure, particularly with a slightly better breakpoint save percentage, which can be pivotal in tight match scenarios.
Chase holds a more consistent match win record over the past year, alongside facing higher-ranked opponents, which suggests a play style suited to competitive environments.
Both players have strengths on different surfaces, with Chase exhibiting better resilience in deciding sets. These aspects hint at Chase's potential to prevail in critical moments.
Given their head-to-head stats, opponent quality, and deciding set resilience, Chase Ferguson is the favorable choice to win the upcoming match.
Ryo Tabata vs Chase Ferguson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Tabata vs C. Ferguson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 | 
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 | 
| 12 | Games Won | 17 | 
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 | 
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 | 
| 1:57:57 | Average Match Time | 1:57:57 | 
| 61% (55/90) | 1st Serve % | 73% (58/80) | 
| 65% (36/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (43/58) | 
| 49% (17/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (14/22) | 
| 100% (2/2) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (4/10) | 
| 29% (23/80) | Return Points Win % | 41% (37/90) | 
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
Recent Performance Stats
R. Tabata Recent Matches Played
C. Ferguson Recent Matches Played

R. Tabata vs C. Ferguson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44.83% (13/16) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.15% (97/67) | 
| 43.94% (29/37) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.18% (211/158) | 
| 45.93% (288/339) | Games Win/Loss | 53.92% (1838/1571) | 
| 47.83% (11/12) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.06% (72/52) | 
| 33.33% (1/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.00% (16/9) | 
| 33.33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (4/2) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 55.56% (5/4) | 
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 | 
| 49 | Aces Total | 192 | 
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 | 
| 50 | Total Double Faults | 184 | 
| 1:26:19 | Average Match Time | 1:15:6 | 
| 529.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 308.46 | 
| 65% (1102/1699) | 1st Serve % | 70% (5333/7581) | 
| 61% (676/1102) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (3492/5333) | 
| 46% (277/597) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1166/2248) | 
| 44% (66/149) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (352/809) | 
| 39% (653/1654) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3176/7725) | 
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 46.43% (13/15) | Futures W/L | 59.15% (97/67) | 
| 41% (11/27) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (96/161) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 83% (5/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (19/38) | 
| 50% (5/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (23/41) | 
| 85% (13/11) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (92/85) | 
| 15% (13/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (92/7) | 
| 13% (16/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (72/11) |