Ryder Jackson (2001) vs John Hallquist Lithen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 04:16 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Jackson (2001) vs J. Hallquist Lithen

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Jackson 1 - 0 Lithen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ryder Jackson (2001) winning 2 and John Hallquist Lithen winning 0. The last match between Ryder Jackson (2001) and John Hallquist Lithen was at the M15 Malta, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ryder Jackson (2001) getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jackson | 1 |
| Lithen | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Malta(10-29-25)
R. Jackson vs J. H. Lithen H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 62.50% (5-3) | Career Total W/L | 58.65% (61-43) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Jackson vs J. H. Lithen Match Preview:
- Question: How has Ryder Jackson performed on their second serve in recent form?
Answer: Ryder Jackson has won 0% of points on their second serve in the last six months. - John Hallquist Lithen shows a strong second serve performance with a 43.20% win rate on points, providing a significant edge over Ryder.
- In terms of return games, Ryder Jackson has struggled, securing 0% on opponent's second and first serve points recently.
- John Hallquist Lithen, however, has achieved 44.24% and 28.46% on second and first serve returns, respectively, suggesting better all-around return ability.
- When facing breakpoints, Ryder Jackson has not saved any, whereas John Hallquist Lithen has shown resilience, saving 51.47%.
- Despite Ryder Jackson's perfect win rate over the last year (3/0 matches), John Hallquist Lithen has more match experience with a 57.41% win rate (31/23 matches).
- Both players excel on Hard courts with a consistent 67% win rate, indicating no surface-based advantage.
- Ryder Jackson primarily competes at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, maintaining a perfect win record, while John Hallquist Lithen competes and wins there at a lower rate.
- Ryder Jackson's recent opponent quality is unknown due to an average rank of 0, while John Hallquist Lithen has faced stronger competitors with an average rank of 326.17.
- In deciding sets, John Hallquist Lithen (33% win rate) performs better than Ryder Jackson, who has won none in the past 12 months.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
Despite Ryder Jackson's flawless recent record, his lack of success on second serve points and return games presents significant challenges. These weaknesses, compounded by zero breakpoint conversions in recent form, suggest vulnerability against more experienced players.
John Hallquist Lithen's superior performance on both serve and return statistics, particularly his ability to save breakpoints, highlights his competitiveness. Although he has a lower overall win percentage compared to Ryder, John has tested his skills against higher-ranked opponents, preparing him for tougher matches.
The deciding set matchups show Lithen's comparative strength. Given these factors, John Hallquist Lithen is favored to win this upcoming tennis match based on his consistent form and broader match experience.
Ryder Jackson (2001) vs John Hallquist Lithen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Jackson vs J. H. Lithen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Jackson Recent Matches Played
J. H. Lithen Recent Matches Played

R. Jackson vs J. H. Lithen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.50% (5/3) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.65% (61/43) |
| 62.50% (10/6) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.94% (135/98) |
| 56.93% (78/59) | Games Win/Loss | 53.45% (1140/993) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Hard Win/Loss | 75.00% (21/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.78% (38/34) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 72 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 140 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:15:9 |
| 338.88 | Average Opponent Rank | 375.72 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 69% (3490/5091) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (2117/3490) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (780/1601) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (242/547) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2037/4910) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Futures W/L | 59.41% (60/41) |
| 63% (5/8) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (60/103) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (11/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 100% (5/5) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (61/55) |
| 0% (5/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (61/6) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (43/6) |