Ryan Nijboer vs Mario Gonzalez Fernandez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 31 Oct at 07:49 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Nijboer vs M. Gonzalez Fernandez

NED
1
Win
Played
1
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Nijboer 1 - 1 Fernandez
They have played 5 sets in total, with Ryan Nijboer winning 3 and Mario Gonzalez Fernandez winning 2. The last match between Ryan Nijboer and Mario Gonzalez Fernandez was at the M25 Sintra, 31-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nijboer | 1 |
| Fernandez | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Sintra(10-31-25)
(R1) M15 Sharm El Sheikh(10-13-21)
R. Nijboer vs M. G. Fernandez H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $5,735 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.70% (296-226) | Career Total W/L | 58.72% (192-135) |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Nijboer vs M. G. Fernandez Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: In the last six months, Ryan Nijboer has slightly outperformed Mario Gonzalez Fernandez on second serve points, winning 39.72% compared to 39.40%. Could this small edge make a difference? In tightly contested matches, every cent of a percentage counts.
- Return Game Stats: Mario Gonzalez Fernandez shows a stronger return game, capturing 49.86% of opponent's second serve points, while Ryan wins 45.59%. This advantage extends to first serve returns, with Mario at 33.28% over Ryan's 29.34%. Could Mario’s aggressive return play tip the scales? Perhaps.
- Under Pressure Resilience: Ryan Nijboer excels at saving breakpoints, boasting a 52.68% save rate compared to Mario's 46.35%. Is this suggestive of Ryan's calm under pressure? It often reflects mental fortitude in critical moments.
- Overall Match Performance: In the past year, Mario Gonzalez Fernandez has a slightly higher match win rate at 57.58% compared to Ryan’s 54.22%. Does this signal a trend of more consistent performance for Mario? It might indicate a steadier play style.
- Surface Proficiency: Both players have their best win rates on Hard courts, equal at 60%. Mario's weakest surface is Clay with a 54% win rate, while Ryan struggles on I.hard courts at 22%. Does this give any player a distinct surface advantage? Not on Hard courts, where they are evenly matched.
- Playing Level: When competing in $10K events, Ryan has a higher win rate at 65.31% compared to Mario's 60.66%. Does this imply Ryan could outperform in lower-tier events? Possibly.
- Head-to-Head: Mario Gonzalez Fernandez leads their direct encounters 1-0, having won the last match on hard courts. Could previous wins spark confidence for Mario? History can often predict future patterns.
- Opponent Quality: Mario has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents on average (423.88) compared to Ryan (448.92) in the past 12 months. Does this tougher competition sharpen Mario’s skills? It might prepare a player for more challenging matches.
- Deciding Set Performance: Mario Gonzalez Fernandez edges out Ryan, winning 42% of deciding sets versus Ryan’s 38%. Does this suggest Mario’s greater stamina or mental edge in pivotal moments? Likely, it points to composure under pressure.
Editorial Prediction (October 31, 2025, UTC):
As we assess the dynamics between Ryan Nijboer and Mario Gonzalez Fernandez, Mario holds a marginal edge. His superior return game, illustrated by higher percentages in returning both first and second serves, positions him as an assertive competitor. This aggressive stance on return points could erode Ryan's serve efficacy, shifting momentum in Mario’s favor.
Mario also demonstrates consistent match performance, slightly better deciding set statistics, and prior victory over Ryan. These factors contribute to an aura of reliability that could inspire confidence in critical stages of the match.
While Ryan has the advantage in saving breakpoints and performing well under pressure, his struggling return statistics and historical record against Mario don't stand out as favorably.
Given these comprehensive insights, Mario Gonzalez Fernandez emerges as the likely favorite to secure victory in their imminent clash.
Ryan Nijboer vs Mario Gonzalez Fernandez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Nijboer vs M. G. Fernandez H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 22 | Games Won | 18 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:48:3 | Average Match Time | 1:48:3 |
| 68% (86/126) | 1st Serve % | 57% (85/149) |
| 69% (59/86) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (48/85) |
| 43% (17/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (30/64) |
| 33% (8/24) | Break Pts Won % | 55% (6/11) |
| 48% (71/149) | Return Points Win % | 40% (50/126) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Nijboer Recent Matches Played
M. G. Fernandez Recent Matches Played

R. Nijboer vs M. G. Fernandez Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.70% (296/226) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.72% (192/135) |
| 56.23% (681/530) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.30% (428/319) |
| 52.84% (5942/5304) | Games Win/Loss | 53.93% (3703/3163) |
| 59.41% (101/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.54% (128/80) |
| 57.72% (187/137) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.78% (64/55) |
| 28.57% (8/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1207 | Aces Total | 362 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 1832 | Total Double Faults | 1086 |
| 1:34:39 | Average Match Time | 1:28:36 |
| 479.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 367.16 |
| 63% (19861/31520) | 1st Serve % | 63% (10716/17087) |
| 67% (13297/19861) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (6747/10716) |
| 46% (5345/11659) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3020/6371) |
| 45% (1601/3536) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (993/2128) |
| 42% (13558/31908) | Return Points Win % | 45% (7864/17535) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.22% (38/52) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 60.19% (257/170) | Futures W/L | 60.00% (189/126) |
| 57% (289/510) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (184/316) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 47% (65/138) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (33/69) |
| 46% (77/167) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (49/98) |
| 83% (311/259) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (195/165) |
| 17% (311/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (195/29) |
| 18% (211/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (132/27) |