Prediction of Ryan Nijboer [397th] vs John Sperle [651st] Head-to-Head At The 2025 M15 Antalya (04-25-25)
By Wojtek Kolan - April 25, 2025
Nijboer is scheduled to play Sperle on Friday at 08:30 AM CET, in the M15 Antalya, Quarterfinals.
Form
W L W L W W W L W W
Form
W L L W W L L L W WNijboer vs. Sperle Prediction
Based on the implied probability from the moneyline, Nijboer has a 69.56% chance to win.
⚠️BE AWARE: Join the Matchstat.com tennis picks club to unlock implied and actual predictions to get access to value bets in order to unlock winning bets.
To Win
| Match | BOOKIE PREDICTION |
BOOKIE ODDS |
|---|---|---|
| John Sperle | 30.44% | +211 |
| Ryan Nijboer | 69.56% | -277 |
| Above is implied from odds. Login / Register to find out our expert predictions with edge / profit forecast. |
Games
| MARKET | BOOKIE PROBABILITY |
Bookie ODDS |
|---|---|---|
| Over 20 Games | 84.03% | -526 |
| Above is implied from odds. Login / Register to find out our expert predictions with edge / profit forecast. |
Head To Head: Nijboer 2 - 0 Sperle
Nijboer and Sperle have faced off in five sets, with Nijboer taking four and Sperle one. Their latest clash was at the M25 Sabadell on September 28, 2023, where Nijboer triumphed 6-3, 6-1 on clay. Who will come out on top in their next encounter?
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ryan Nijboer | 2 |
| John Sperle | 0 |
| Nijboer | Stats | Sperle |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (15-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (11-8) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 397 | Ranking | 651 |
| 371 | Highest Rank | 635 |
| 25 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (270-206) | Career Total W/L | 58% (139-101) |
| $5,735 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
John Sperle
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 6-4 4-6 6-3 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
John Sperle
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 28 | Games Won | 17 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:53:0 | Average Match Time | 1:53:0 |
| 69% (98/143) | 1st Serve % | 62% (81/131) |
| 62% (61/98) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (43/81) |
| 51% (23/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (22/50) |
| 60% (12/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 55% (6/11) |
| 50% (66/131) | Return Points Win % | 41% (59/143) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Current Event Stats
M15 Antalya
Clay| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Total Matches | 2 |
| 2:21:39 | Last Match | 1:24:53 |
| 4:33:56 | Total Time | 2:30:23 |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 25 | Aces Total | 8 |
| 0.54 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 49 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 59% (340/572) | 1st Serve % | 68% (440/645) |
| 69% (236/340) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (255/440) |
| 45% (105/232) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (106/205) |
| 49% (37/75) | Total Break Points Won % | 51% (44/86) |
| 68% (15/22) | Total Break Points Saved | 75% (9/12) |
| 71% (17/24) | Service Hold (%) | 80% (12/15) |
| 58% (14/24) | Opponent Hold % | 27% (4/15) |
| 47% (279/596) | Return Points Win % | 47% (341/719) |
| 53% (620/1168) | Total Points Won | 51% (702/1364) |
| 100% (2/1) | Tiebreak Win % | 33% (1/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/0) |
| 0.50 | Tiebreaks Per Match | 0.00 |
| 100% (8/8) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (6/6) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (5/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ryan Nijboer vs John Sperle Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nijboer 2 - 0 Sperle
Editorial Prediction:
Ah, the ever-mysterious art of predicting tennis outcomes! In recent excursions on the court, Nijboer has been channeling their inner Houdini, saving 52.78% of breakpoints. Meanwhile, Sperle has managed to dodge the breakpoint bullets with a modest 42.99% success rate. Both players have dipped their toes into the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K pool, where Nijboer has been on a roll, winning 69.57% of their matches. Not to be completely outdone, Sperle’s been swinging at a decent 59.32% success rate.
When it comes to second serve conundrums, Nijboer performs acrobatics to win 42.83% of points, while Sperle edges them out slightly with 43.1%. But wait, return specialists rejoice, for Nijboer claims 48.25% of their rival's second serve points, trailing Sperle’s 50.51% prowess. What about the trickier first serves, you ask? Nijboer scampers for 28.96%, with Sperle soaring at 33.49% like an eagle looking for a snack.
Let’s talk surfaces—those quirky hard courts that make Nijboer feel like a superstar, boasting a career win of 59%. But don't invite them to an Indoor Hard party; that has seen them produce a mere 22% win rate. Sperle, on the other hand, fancies themselves a regular Raphael on clay with an impressive 61% career win rate. Indoor Hard isn’t entirely their cup of tea either, at a slightly better 40%.
In the match of the giants, they’ve bumped rackets twice, with Nijboer walking away victorious both times. He has secured 4 out of 5 sets, lending him an air of invincibility that would make even a Greek deity nervous. Remember that deciding set situation? Talk about edge-of-your-seat drama! Nijboer seized the only deciding set, while Sperle was left searching for the magic touch. In case the match tips into marathon territory, Nijboer and Sperle have clocked an average of 1 hour and 53 minutes of rallying each other to physical limits. They’ve laid on the court dramaturgy, showing great potential to break more than just rackets—in this case, maybe even some hearts.
And when we consult the crystal ball, one might raise the argument that Nijboer’s been traversing battlefields with opponents averaging 454.25 in rank. Sperle plays against a slightly more formidable rank of 446.56—impressive, but not groundbreaking enough to shake Nijboer's composed racket hand. Nijboer's been nimble, having converted 37.97% of breakpoint opportunities, while Sperle has curiously managed a 38.82% conversion rate. Add it all up, and though Sperle has taken more sets in deciding matches on tour in general with a suave 65%, against his current opponent's whims, Nijboer's 47% might have just enough trickery to pull the hat off the rabbit!
So who wins this carnival of a duel, you ask? Based on all these gleaming stats and peculiar anecdotes, Nijboer might just be lugging home more than just a trophy, perhaps the title of the champion of wit and racketeering for the day!
Ryan Nijboer vs John Sperle Best Odds For The Match
To Win
Sperle
+211
Nijboer
-277
Games
> 20
-526
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Valentin Vanta
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
81%
(
67 of
83)
2
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marlon Vankan
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marvin Moeller
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marcel Zielinski
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Mert Aytekin
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Ryan Nijboer
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
54%
(
57 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
77 of
115)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Ryan Nijboer
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Daniel Cukierman
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
John Sperle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Jakub Filip
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Ignacio Parisca
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
74%
(
28 of
38)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Karol
Player
John Sperle
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Younes Lalami Laaroussi
Player
John Sperle
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Player
John Sperle
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Andrey Chepelev
73%
(
65 of
89)
1st Serve %
85%
(
87 of
102)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
54 of
87)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
95
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Noel Larwig
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niccolo Catini
Player
John Sperle
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dusan Obradovic
Player
John Sperle
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Arthur Nagel
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
81%
(
88 of
108)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
49 of
88)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Nijboer vs Sperle?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Nijboer Vs Sperle is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (165/119) | Win/Loss | 61% (116/75) |
| 57% (380/285) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (249/176) |
| 53% (3232/2884) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2130/1789) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 527 | Aces Total | 174 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1060 | Total Double Faults | 258 |
| 1:39:46 | Average Match Time | 1:16:9 |
| 458.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 345.12 |
| 63% (11078/17616) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5982/9213) |
| 66% (7300/11078) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (3736/5982) |
| 45% (2973/6538) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1589/3231) |
| 47% (981/2086) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (517/1077) |
| 44% (7832/17812) | Return Points Win % | 44% (4073/9254) |
| 58% (160/275) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (113/186) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (36/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (15/35) |
| 48% (46/96) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (28/48) |
| 83% (172/142) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (117/105) |
| 17% (172/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (117/12) |
| 21% (112/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (74/11) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ryan Nijboer
View full predicted draw for Nijboer
Potential H2H Matches This Week For John Sperle
View full predicted draw for Sperle
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
