Ryan Nijboer vs Diego Barreto Sanchez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W W W L
Form
W W L W L L W W L WHead-To-Head: Nijboer 1 - 1 Sanchez
They have played 5 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 3 and Sanchez winning 2. The last match between Nijboer and Sanchez was at the M15 Madrid, 07-12-2023, Second, Clay with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ryan Nijboer | 1 |
| Diego Barreto Sanchez | 1 |
M15 Madrid(07-12-2023)
6
2
6
1
| Nijboer | Stats | Sanchez |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (16-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (11-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 397 | Ranking | 603 |
| 371 | Highest Rank | 546 |
| 25 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (271-207) | Career Total W/L | 58% (182-133) |
| $5,735 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 5-7 6-0 6-3 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Ryan Nijboer
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
98)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
13
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
53 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 22 | Games Won | 20 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 15 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:51:30 | Average Match Time | 1:51:30 |
| 68% (93/136) | 1st Serve % | 59% (82/140) |
| 68% (63/93) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (48/82) |
| 26% (11/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (27/58) |
| 62% (8/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (7/15) |
| 46% (65/140) | Return Points Win % | 46% (62/136) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Alex Molcan
Player
Ryan Nijboer
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
John Sperle
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Valentin Vanta
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
81%
(
67 of
83)
2
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marlon Vankan
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marvin Moeller
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marcel Zielinski
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Mert Aytekin
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Ryan Nijboer
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
54%
(
57 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
77 of
115)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Diego Barreto Sanchez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Semen Pankin
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kristijan Juhas
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Dusan Bazdar
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
86 of
132)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
51 of
86)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
59 of
132)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Leonardo Angeloni
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (271/207) | Win/Loss | 58% (182/133) |
| 56% (626/489) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (400/308) |
| 53% (5483/4874) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3454/2998) |
| 59% (97/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (32/32) |
| 58% (166/120) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (150/101) |
| 29% (8/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1102 | Aces Total | 321 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1657 | Total Double Faults | 490 |
| 1:33:25 | Average Match Time | 1:27:17 |
| 466.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 414.23 |
| 63% (18079/28649) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10028/16417) |
| 67% (12077/18079) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (6328/10028) |
| 46% (4849/10570) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3158/6389) |
| 46% (1468/3225) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (859/1950) |
| 43% (12426/29151) | Return Points Win % | 43% (7197/16582) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (31/43) | Challenger W/L | 41% (11/16) |
| 60% (239/160) | Futures W/L | 59% (171/117) |
| 57% (265/467) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (179/309) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 47% (60/128) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (27/59) |
| 47% (74/158) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (43/81) |
| 83% (284/235) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (179/156) |
| 17% (284/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (179/23) |
| 19% (194/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (136/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
