Ryan Dickerson vs Evan Zhu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Jul at 10:33 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Dickerson vs E. Zhu

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dickerson 1 - 0 Zhu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ryan Dickerson winning 2 and Evan Zhu winning 0. The last match between Ryan Dickerson and Evan Zhu was at the M15 Los Angeles, 01-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ryan Dickerson getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Dickerson | 1 |
Zhu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Los Angeles(07-01-25)
R. Dickerson vs E. Zhu H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $3,445 |
59.22% (106-73) | Career Total W/L | 50.42% (239-235) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
0 | Titles | 3 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Dickerson vs E. Zhu Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows Zhu has won 46.52% of points compared to Dickerson's 44.76%. Could this give Zhu a slight edge?
- When analyzing return game stats, Dickerson marginally leads, winning 47.11% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Zhu is at 46.68%.
- First serve return percentages are nearly identical, with Dickerson at 29.81% and Zhu at 29.77%.
- Under pressure, Dickerson has saved 57.14% of breakpoints, which is significantly higher than Zhu's 48.62%. Is consistency under pressure Dickerson’s advantage?
- Performance overview indicates Zhu has won slightly more matches in the last year with a 57.14% win rate, compared to Dickerson's 56.1%.
- Clay is both players' favored surface; Dickerson has a 61% win rate, barely ahead of Zhu's 59%.
- Despite that both frequently compete in the ITF circuits, Zhu has won 60.42% of matches, surpassing Dickerson’s 56.1% win rate.
- On average, Dickerson faces higher-ranked opponents (rank 226.66), compared to those Zhu faces (rank 443.52). Does this indicate a tougher competition level for Dickerson?
- Deciding set success is dramatically different; Zhu has won 67% of deciding sets, while Dickerson only 23%.
- Dickerson has a higher break point conversion rate at 33.33%, compared to Zhu's 30.21%.
Editorial Prediction (July 1, 2025, UTC):
Both Dickerson and Zhu have strengths tailored to certain aspects of their game. Dickerson shows a strong resistance under pressure, evidenced by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints. Additionally, his ability to convert break point opportunities more effectively could play a decisive role.
Zhu's advantage is notable in deciding set performance, where her 67% win rate stands out significantly compared to Dickerson's 23%. Moreover, Zhu's slightly stronger recent second serve stats suggest she can maintain serve better during critical match moments.
Although Dickerson plays against higher-ranked opponents, which could prepare him well for challenging matches, the ability of Zhu to win crucial sets and her higher overall win percentage give her a slight upper hand.
Considering these patterns and Zhu's decisive edge in the final sets, she is likely to be the favorite in this upcoming tennis match.
Ryan Dickerson vs Evan Zhu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Dickerson vs E. Zhu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 7 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
0:38:29 | Average Match Time | 0:38:29 |
59% (16/27) | 1st Serve % | 82% (14/17) |
44% (7/16) | 1st Serve Win % | 14% (2/14) |
55% (6/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (2/3) |
60% (3/5) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
76% (13/17) | Return Points Win % | 52% (14/27) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Dickerson Recent Matches Played
E. Zhu Recent Matches Played

R. Dickerson vs E. Zhu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59.22% (106/73) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.42% (239/235) |
59.57% (249/169) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.05% (544/565) |
54.39% (2120/1778) | Games Win/Loss | 50.02% (5223/5218) |
58.42% (59/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 49.36% (154/158) |
62.67% (47/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.54% (72/51) |
0.00% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36.11% (13/23) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
171 | Aces Total | 1247 |
0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
474 | Total Double Faults | 1156 |
1:8:17 | Average Match Time | 1:23:48 |
307.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 478.43 |
63% (4165/6587) | 1st Serve % | 62% (17270/28003) |
66% (2745/4165) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (11364/17270) |
44% (1071/2422) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5264/10733) |
47% (309/662) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1121/2694) |
41% (2667/6495) | Return Points Win % | 40% (10962/27652) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 14.29% (1/6) |
50.00% (1/1) | Challenger W/L | 41.61% (62/87) |
59.32% (105/72) | Futures W/L | 55.35% (176/142) |
59% (106/179) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (232/467) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
53% (19/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (69/133) |
38% (23/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (94/166) |
79% (121/95) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (226/190) |
21% (121/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (226/36) |
19% (58/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (248/48) |