Prediction of Ruben Bemelmans vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Bemelmans vs N. Fatic

Ruben Bemelmans

BEL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

214

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.0M

Career Money

$74.0K

Left-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nerman Fatic

BIH

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

214

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.0M

Career Money

$74.0K

Left-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Bemelmans 1 - 0 Fatic

They have played 3 sets in total, with Ruben Bemelmans winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 1. The last match between Ruben Bemelmans and Nerman Fatic was at the M25 Trento, 28-02-2020, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Ruben Bemelmans getting the victory 6-2 6-7(4) 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Bemelmans	1
Fatic	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QF) M25 Trento(02-28-20)

Stats

Ruben Bemelmans

Nerman Fatic

R. Bemelmans vs N. Fatic H2H Profile

R. Bemelmans	Stats	N. Fatic
$1,013,488	Career Prize Money	$73,995
56.85% (552-419)	Career Total W/L	58.47% (404-287)
1	Indoor	0
20	Titles	12
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-1)

R. Bemelmans vs N. Fatic Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ruben Bemelmans has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nerman Fatic has won 44.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ruben Bemelmans, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nerman Fatic has won 45.34%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Ruben Bemelmans has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nerman Fatic has saved 54.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Ruben Bemelmans has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nerman Fatic winning 73.91% (W/L 51/18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Ruben Bemelmans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 173/130), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/84). Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Ruben Bemelmans has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ruben Bemelmans winning 1 times and Nerman Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ruben Bemelmans winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 1.
The last match between Ruben Bemelmans and Nerman Fatic was at the M25 Trento, 28-02-2020, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Ruben Bemelmans getting the victory 6-2 6-7(4) 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ruben Bemelmans has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nerman Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 338.61.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ruben Bemelmans has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nerman Fatic has won 84% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Ruben Bemelmans has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nerman Fatic has converted 33.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Ruben Bemelmans vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Bemelmans vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Bemelmans	Stats	N. Fatic
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
18	Games Won	11
8	Aces (Total)	8
2	Total Double Faults	4
2:4:0	Average Match Time	2:4:0
64% (54/85)	1st Serve %	67% (73/109)
72% (39/54)	1st Serve Win %	63% (46/73)
58% (18/31)	2nd Serve Win %	31% (11/36)
38% (6/16)	Break Pts Won %	33% (2/6)
48% (52/109)	Return Points Win %	33% (28/85)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Bemelmans Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
European Open - Antwerp - 17-10-2022
Q1 Geoffrey BlancaneauxG. Blancaneaux	L	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Ilkley Challenger - 13-06-2022
Q1 Zizou BergsZ. Bergs	L	7-6(5) 6-4	Stats
Tunis Challenger - 16-05-2022
R1 Zhizhen ZhangZ. Zhang	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Heilbronn Challenger - 09-05-2022
Q1 Rudolf MollekerR. Molleker	L	6-4 3-6 7-6(4)	Stats
M25 Nottingham - 18-04-2022
R1 Henry PattenH. Patten	L	5-7 6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

R. Bemelmans vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Bemelmans	Stats	N. Fatic
56.85% (552/419)	YTD Win/Loss	58.47% (404/287)
55.30% (1294/1046)	Sets Win/Loss	57.49% (890/658)
52.09% (12026/11063)	Games Win/Loss	53.03% (7602/6734)
54.04% (154/131)	Hard Win/Loss	51.19% (43/41)
48.47% (79/84)	Clay Win/Loss	61.00% (341/218)
62.56% (259/155)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.48% (20/26)
55.05% (60/49)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
0.36	Aces Per Game	0.23
4063	Aces Total	1598
0.17	Double Faults Per Game	0.22
1912	Total Double Faults	1517
1:5:15	Average Match Time	1:20:1
596.46	Average Opponent Rank	509.29
63% (32697/51842)	1st Serve %	66% (23791/35820)
73% (23728/32697)	1st Serve Win %	65% (15579/23791)
52% (9987/19146)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (5772/12029)
40% (1787/4501)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (1969/4222)
37% (19613/52826)	Return Points Win %	43% (15618/36165)
56.03% (65/51)	Slam W/L	20.00% (1/4)
36.00% (9/16)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/1)
34.78% (8/15)	Cups W/L	40.00% (4/6)
50.00% (77/77)	Main Tour W/L	25.00% (3/9)
54.68% (263/218)	Challenger W/L	52.89% (119/106)
75.58% (130/42)	Futures W/L	63.24% (277/161)
57% (526/916)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	60% (394/662)
43% (19/44)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/3)
50% (208/420)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (79/156)
50% (173/347)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (102/189)
84% (542/456)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (394/348)
15% (542/84)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (394/42)
21% (428/92)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (297/57)