Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Tatum Evans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Nov at 04:56 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Marie Nijkamp vs T. Evans

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nijkamp 1 - 0 Evans
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rose Marie Nijkamp winning 2 and Tatum Evans winning 0. The last match between Rose Marie Nijkamp and Tatum Evans was at the W15 Clemson, 12-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Rose Marie Nijkamp getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nijkamp | 1 |
| Evans | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Clemson(11-12-25)
R. M. Nijkamp vs T. Evans H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 60.29% (41-27) | Career Total W/L | 52.27% (23-21) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. M. Nijkamp vs T. Evans Match Preview:
- How effective is Tatum Evans' second serve lately? In recent months, they have won 0% of points on their second serve. In contrast, Rose Marie Nijkamp has secured 35.96% of these points, significantly enhancing their match forecast.
- Does Rose Marie Nijkamp have an advantage in return games? Yes, having won 55.25% of points on opponents' second serves, compared to Tatum Evans' 0%.
- In first serve return scenarios, Nijkamp leads with 36.36% of points compared to Evans' 0%.
- Under pressure, Tatum Evans has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, while Rose Marie Nijkamp has successfully saved 43.26%, indicating better composure in critical moments.
- Last year’s win-loss ratio favors Evans at 100.00% (2/0 matches), over Nijkamp's 67.65% (23/11 matches). However, the level of competition varies significantly between them.
- Preferred playing surfaces vary: Evans excels on Hard (62% win rate), while Nijkamp performs best on Clay (62% win rate).
- Competitive level differences: Evans primarily competes in lower-level tournaments (Futures/Satellites), achieving a 100% win rate, whereas Nijkamp plays more at the Challengers level, with a 54.17% win rate, reflecting a difference in competition caliber.
- Who faces tougher opponents? Rose Marie Nijkamp, as Evans' opponents had an average rank of 0, contrasting with Nijkamp's 346.68.
- In deciding sets, Nijkamp has a 50% win rate over the past year, compared to Evans' 0%, suggesting better stamina or mental toughness.
- Break point conversion is another key area: Nijkamp excels with a 41.63% success rate, whereas Evans hasn't converted any recently.
Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):
As the upcoming tennis match approaches, analyzing recent performance trends provides a clear perspective on the expected outcomes. Tatum Evans faces significant challenges with their second serve performance, where they have not managed to secure any points in the last six months. In contrast, Rose Marie Nijkamp has been able to win nearly 36% of second serve points, offering her a considerable advantage.
When evaluating the ability to handle pressure, Nijkamp again surpasses Evans by successfully saving over 43% of breakpoints, while Evans has yet to save any. This indicates Nijkamp's superior mental fortitude in crucial moments.
Although Evans has a 100% win rate over the past year, the level of competition and opponent quality significantly skews this statistic. Nijkamp, who has faced more competitive and ranked players, holds a substantial lead in return games and breakpoint conversion, enhancing her tactical edge.
Considering all factors and statistics, Rose Marie Nijkamp is more favorably positioned to win this upcoming match, given her decisive advantages in second serve effectiveness, pressure resilience, and overall competitive experience.
Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Tatum Evans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. M. Nijkamp vs T. Evans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:57:44 | Average Match Time | 1:57:44 |
| 54% (38/71) | 1st Serve % | 56% (35/62) |
| 55% (21/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (18/35) |
| 55% (18/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (10/27) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (3/11) |
| 55% (34/62) | Return Points Win % | 45% (32/71) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. M. Nijkamp Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-0 | ||
QF | W | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
F | W | 6-2 7-5 | ||
T. Evans Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-7(4) 7-6(2) 10-6 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||

R. M. Nijkamp vs T. Evans Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.29% (41/27) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.27% (23/21) |
| 59.62% (93/63) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.53% (52/47) |
| 53.62% (762/659) | Games Win/Loss | 52.09% (462/425) |
| 50.00% (9/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.26% (16/11) |
| 64.00% (32/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.46% (5/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 58 | Aces Total | 23 |
| 0.67 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 468 | Total Double Faults | 167 |
| 1:42:21 | Average Match Time | 1:17:24 |
| 408.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 399.73 |
| 61% (2715/4447) | 1st Serve % | 65% (1226/1898) |
| 60% (1623/2715) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (688/1226) |
| 40% (695/1732) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (282/672) |
| 53% (324/614) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (122/261) |
| 50% (2175/4362) | Return Points Win % | 46% (918/1977) |
| 55.17% (16/13) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (16/16) |
| 64.10% (25/14) | Futures W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 60% (41/68) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (23/44) |
| 44% (4/9) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
| 45% (9/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (5/11) |
| 86% (43/37) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (22/20) |
| 14% (43/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (22/2) |
| 16% (25/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (22/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025
