Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Maria Shmakova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 15 Jul at 05:25 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

R. Marie Nijkamp vs M. Shmakova

Rose Marie Nijkamp
Rose Marie Nijkamp

Flag NED NED

w
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
Maria Shmakova
Maria Shmakova

Flag RUS RUS

w
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

19
Age
18
-
Height
-
717
C. Rank
0
717
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Nijkamp 1 - 0 Shmakova

They have played 2 sets in total, with Rose Marie Nijkamp winning 2 and Maria Shmakova winning 0. The last match between Rose Marie Nijkamp and Maria Shmakova was at the W35 Casablanca, 15-07-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Rose Marie Nijkamp getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-1.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Nijkamp1
Shmakova0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q3W35 Casablanca(07-15-25)

Clay
NED Flag
Rose Marie Nijkamp
7
6
RUS Flag
Maria Shmakova
6
1

R. M. Nijkamp vs M. Shmakova H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
59.38% (38-26)Career Total W/L56.25% (27-21)
1Clay0
2Titles0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

R. M. Nijkamp vs M. Shmakova Match Preview:

  • Nijkamp has shown a stronger second serve performance recently, winning 38.6% of their second serve points, slightly ahead of Shmakova's 36.11%. Could this slight edge contribute to a match win?
  • In return games, Nijkamp also leads, winning 58.68% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Shmakova's 57.56%.
  • When returning first serves, Nijkamp again has the advantage, with a 36.13% success rate versus Shmakova's 33.33%.
  • Despite the return game edge, under pressure, Shmakova excels by saving 50.68% of breakpoints, surpassing Nijkamp’s 43.75% breakpoint save rate.
  • According to last year's performance, Nijkamp has a higher match win rate at 63.33%, compared to Shmakova's 55.26%, showing stronger overall performance.
  • Both players have their best surface on clay, with Shmakova having a slightly better win percentage of 65% compared to Nijkamp's 62% on this surface. Shmakova also performs better on hard surfaces.
  • Nijkamp has faced opponents with a higher average ranking (152.87), suggesting more competitive experience compared to Shmakova's average opponent ranking of 477.93.
  • In deciding sets, Nijkamp demonstrates remarkable resilience, winning 80% compared to Shmakova’s 33% win rate in similar scenarios.
  • Both players are nearly equal in breakpoint conversion rates, with Shmakova holding a marginal advantage at 36.36%, over Nijkamp’s 36.11%.

Editorial Prediction (July 15, 2025, UTC):

Nijkamp's slight lead in second serve performance and notable success in return games highlight their technical strengths on the court when it comes to capitalizing on opponent's serves.

Although Shmakova excels in saving breakpoints and has shown proficiency on both clay and hard courts, Nijkamp’s overall superior performance and experience playing higher-ranked opponents make them a formidable contender in matchups.

Considering the deciding set performances, where Nijkamp dominates, the likelihood swings in their favor if the match tightens.

Despite Shmakova’s competencies, Nijkamp’s all-around edge in performance metrics positions them as the probable winner of the upcoming tennis match.

Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Maria Shmakova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. M. Nijkamp vs M. Shmakova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
13Games Won7
0Aces (Total)1
2:7:41Average Match Time2:7:41
89% (55/62)1st Serve %90% (73/81)
60% (33/55)1st Serve Win %40% (29/73)
29% (2/7)2nd Serve Win %63% (5/8)
40% (6/15)Break Pts Won %50% (4/8)
58% (47/81)Return Points Win %44% (27/62)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Nijkamp 41%, Shmakova 41%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Nijkamp 60%, Shmakova 58%.
Break Points Saved %: Nijkamp 56%, Shmakova 51%.

R. M. Nijkamp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayW15 Sumter - 27-10-2025

F

USAC. Tanguilig
W
6-2 7-5

SF

USAT. Frodin
W
7-5 6-1

QF

MEXM. Navarro
W
6-2 6-2

R2

GBRD. Piani
W
6-2 7-5

R1

ESPC. Gay
W
6-2 6-3

M. Shmakova Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayW35 Mohammedia - 21-07-2025

Q3

RUSP. Kaibekova
L
6-3 7-6(5)

Q2

INDJ. Kumari
W
6-2 6-2
ClayW35 Casablanca - 14-07-2025

Q3

NEDR. Marie
L
7-6(4) 6-1

Q2

BRAB. Liotto
W
6-1 3-6 10-6
HardW35 Taipei - 23-06-2025

Q1

TPEY. Li
L
6-3 6-4
banner

R. M. Nijkamp vs M. Shmakova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
59.38% (38/26)YTD Win/Loss56.25% (27/21)
58.90% (86/60)Sets Win/Loss57.27% (63/47)
53.46% (711/619)Games Win/Loss53.57% (563/488)
42.86% (6/8)Hard Win/Loss50.00% (11/11)
64.00% (32/18)Clay Win/Loss61.54% (16/10)
0.08Aces Per Game0.08
55Aces Total43
0.65Double Faults Per Game0.19
425Total Double Faults98
1:41:23Average Match Time1st Match
394.91Average Opponent Rank146.63
61% (2523/4118)1st Serve %61% (951/1563)
60% (1510/2523)1st Serve Win %60% (575/951)
40% (636/1595)2nd Serve Win %43% (261/612)
52% (301/577)Break Points Won % (Total)47% (82/173)
50% (2029/4083)Return Points Win %45% (656/1470)
55.17% (16/13)Challenger W/L33.33% (2/4)
62.86% (22/13)Futures W/L59.52% (25/17)
59% (38/64)Best of 3 Sets Win %55% (26/47)
38% (3/8)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)57% (4/7)
44% (8/18)Deciding Set Win %33% (5/15)
87% (39/34)1st Set Won, Won Match81% (31/25)
13% (39/5)1st Set Won, Lost Match19% (31/6)
16% (25/4)1st Set Lost, Won Match12% (17/2)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

04:00 AM 12/11/25
Prediction
TPEY. H. Hsu
FRAH. Grenier5
W1
2.35
W2
1.51
10:35 PM 11/11/25
Prediction
BRAJ. L. R. D. Silva
ARGF. Menaq
W1
1.39
W2
2.72
05:00 PM 12/11/25
Prediction
JPNJ. K. Trotter5
CZED. Poljakq
W1
1.091
W2
5.85
01:00 PM 12/11/25
Prediction
SRBL. Djere1
FRAT. ParisWC
W1
1.38
W2
2.76
03:00 AM 12/11/25
Prediction
GBRE. Huddq
JPNH. Matsuokaq
W1
2.28
W2
1.54
12:30 AM 12/11/25
Prediction
USAK. Polingq
CAND. ChanWC
W1
2.4
W2
1.49

Potential H2H Matches This Week

Nijkamp (W15 Clemson)
Buchnik vs NijkampCould play in The Quarterfinals
Hofbauer vs NijkampCould play in The Quarterfinals
Gallego vs NijkampCould play in The Quarterfinals
Schuman vs NijkampCould play in The Quarterfinals
Bhakta vs NijkampCould play in The Second
Soulie vs NijkampCould play in The Second

Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

11 Nov 2025

Sebastian Baez vs Alvaro Guillen Meza Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets

11 Nov 2025

Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets

11 Nov 2025

Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025

11 Nov 2025

Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets

11 Nov 2025

Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets

11 Nov 2025

Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets