Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Facundo Mena Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Nov at 06:32 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Andres Burruchaga vs F. Mena

ARG
3
Win
Played
0
Win

ARG
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Burruchaga 3 - 0 Mena
They have played 8 sets in total, with Roman Andres Burruchaga winning 6 and Facundo Mena winning 2. The last match between Roman Andres Burruchaga and Facundo Mena was at the Montevideo Challenger, 12-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Roman Andres Burruchaga getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Burruchaga | 3 |
| Mena | 0 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R2) Montevideo Challenger(11-12-25)
(F) Piracicaba Challenger(02-02-25)
(R2) Antofagasta Challenger(09-20-23)
R. A. Burruchaga vs F. Mena H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $338,500 | Career Prize Money | $140,110 |
| 59.85% (237-159) | Career Total W/L | 56.75% (513-391) |
| 3 | Clay | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 15 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 42.86% (3-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. A. Burruchaga vs F. Mena Match Preview:
- In recent performance, Facundo Mena has won 46.64% of second serve points, while Roman Andres Burruchaga has secured 42.64%. Could this be a deciding factor in the match? This statistic often predicts match outcomes with high accuracy.
- Facundo Mena's success rate in return games shows he wins 43.42% of his opponent's second serve points, whereas Roman Andres Burruchaga excels with 49.82% in this category. How might this impact their gameplay strategies?
- First serve return stats reveal Roman Andres Burruchaga is stronger, winning 28.08% compared to Mena's 23.36%. Such data is crucial in determining the match favorite for this matchup.
- Under pressure, Mena saves 58.92% of breakpoints, surpassing Burruchaga, who saves 49.49%. Would this indicate an edge for Mena in critical moments?
- Over the past year, Burruchaga has a higher win percentage of 64.29% compared to Mena's 45.45%. Does this reflect their consistency and competitiveness?
- Analyzing best surfaces, Mena thrives on indoor hard surfaces with a 67% win rate, while Burruchaga's best is on grass, also with a 67% win rate. Does the match surface play a role in predicting an advantage?
- On the Champions/ITF tournaments > $10K circuit over the last year, Mena has a 45.71% win rate, whereas Burruchaga boasts 68.85%. Is this indicative of Burruchaga’s higher level performance?
- In their direct encounters, Burruchaga leads with 2 match wins to none, and also wins 4 sets to 2 over Mena. Could this history favor Burruchaga in a face-off?
- Considering opponent quality, Burruchaga’s average opponent rank is approximately 218.25, bettering Mena's 284.95. Might this suggest Burruchaga faces tougher competition?
- If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Burruchaga wins 56% while Mena captures 40%. Could Burruchaga have the advantage in a tight situation?
- On breakpoints, Burruchaga converts 37.34% compared to Mena's 27.68% in recent form. Can this conversion efficacy provide significant momentum shifts during crucial points?
Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):
Assessing recent performances, Roman Andres Burruchaga demonstrates a slight edge in second serve returns and break point conversions, which are critical in high-pressure tennis matches. His ability to win against higher-ranked opponents suggests stronger competitive experience than Facundo Mena.
Despite Mena's resilience in saving breakpoints, Burruchaga's superior win rate in deciding sets and head-to-head matchups further weights the prediction in his favor. This consistent level of play across varied match situations positions Burruchaga as the likely victor for the upcoming tennis match.
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Facundo Mena Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. A. Burruchaga vs F. Mena H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 46 | Games Won | 41 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 16 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:57:43 | Average Match Time | 2:57:43 |
| 63% (197/314) | 1st Serve % | 54% (170/317) |
| 64% (127/197) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (109/170) |
| 50% (59/117) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (70/147) |
| 44% (15/34) | Break Pts Won % | 41% (13/32) |
| 44% (138/317) | Return Points Win % | 41% (128/314) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. A. Burruchaga Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(6) 5-7 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-7(8) 6-2 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
F. Mena Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 7-6(3) | ||
Q3 | L | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | ||

R. A. Burruchaga vs F. Mena Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.85% (237/159) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.75% (513/391) |
| 57.10% (539/405) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.10% (1134/924) |
| 53.01% (4694/4161) | Games Win/Loss | 51.52% (9863/9280) |
| 56.92% (37/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.49% (74/57) |
| 60.43% (197/129) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.81% (434/330) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 655 | Aces Total | 2728 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1353 | Total Double Faults | 1537 |
| 1:45:42 | Average Match Time | 1:3:20 |
| 384.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 517 |
| 62% (16412/26403) | 1st Serve % | 55% (21260/38920) |
| 65% (10699/16412) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (14946/21260) |
| 48% (4789/9991) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8893/17660) |
| 47% (1452/3077) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1766/4109) |
| 44% (11816/26876) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16239/39904) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Slam W/L | 25.00% (4/12) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 52.17% (12/11) | Main Tour W/L | 26.32% (5/14) |
| 60.83% (146/94) | Challenger W/L | 51.50% (189/178) |
| 60.36% (67/44) | Futures W/L | 63.00% (315/185) |
| 60% (232/387) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (509/896) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (52/103) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (155/270) |
| 56% (85/152) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (146/256) |
| 85% (214/182) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (488/426) |
| 14% (214/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (488/61) |
| 30% (182/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (416/87) |