Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez vs Victor Lilov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mendez vs Lilov analysis and find out who is favored!
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez vs Victor Lilov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mendez has won 49.51% of points on his second serve, while Lilov has won 45.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mendez, in recent form, has won 47.9% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lilov has won 47.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.76% and 26.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mendez has saved 54.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lilov has saved 58.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mendez has won 51.72% of matches played (W/L 15/ 14), with Lilov winning 51.85% (W/L 28/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mendez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 9/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 12/ 18). Lilov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 35/ 33).
- Player level: In the last year, Mendez has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 5/ 10), where as Lilov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.05% of matches (W/L 20/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mendez has played against opponents with an average rank of 248.14 while Lilov has played against players with an average rank of 175.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mendez has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lilov has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mendez has converted 44.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lilov has converted 37.84% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mendez 0 - 0 Lilov
636
Rank
636
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
615
Rank
497
High
20
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
40% (21-31)
Career Total W/L
54% (76-66)
45% (5-6)
YTD W/L
22% (2-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez | Victor Lilov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (5/6) | 22% (2/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (12/14) | 27% (6/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (131/142) | 42% (93/126) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 27 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:42 | 2:1:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 366.91 | 226 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (486/755) | 58% (426/731) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (325/486) | 67% (284/426) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (137/269) | 47% (143/305) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (23/50) | 35% (18/51) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (262/741) | 34% (238/690) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (4/4) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (5/11) | 22% (2/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 13% (8/1) |
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Michael Mmoh
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
3
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
17
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Antoine Bellier
65%
(
70 of
107)
1st Serve %
49%
(
52 of
106)
4
Aces
20
9
Double Faults
15
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
44 of
52)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
31 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
34 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(8) 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
James Kent Trotter
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(5) 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
view more
Victor Lilov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victor Lilov
Player
Ajeet Rai
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
102)
3
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victor Lilov
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
4
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
10
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Victor Lilov
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
11
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mwendwa Mbithi
Player
Victor Lilov
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
49 of
60)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Victor Lilov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Axel Nefve
Player
Victor Lilov
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
53%
(
72 of
136)
6
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
54 of
136)
118
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Frusina
Player
Victor Lilov
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Osgar O'Hoisin
Player
Victor Lilov
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
29 of
36)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
14 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Victor Lilov
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mendez Vs Lilov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
