Prediction of Rod Frawley vs Mansour Bahrami Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Frawley vs M. Bahrami

Rod Frawley

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'10" (178 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

192

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Mansour Bahrami

IRI

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'10" (178 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

192

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Frawley 1 - 0 Bahrami

They have played 2 sets in total, with Rod Frawley winning 2 and Mansour Bahrami winning 0. The last match between Rod Frawley and Mansour Bahrami was at the Auckland, 10-01-1977, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Rod Frawley getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Frawley	1
Bahrami	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Auckland(01-10-77)

Stats

Rod Frawley

Mansour Bahrami

R. Frawley vs M. Bahrami H2H Profile

R. Frawley	Stats	M. Bahrami
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
46.69% (134-153)	Career Total W/L	35.59% (42-76)
1	Grass	0
2	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Frawley vs M. Bahrami Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rod Frawley has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mansour Bahrami has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rod Frawley, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mansour Bahrami has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Rod Frawley has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mansour Bahrami has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Rod Frawley has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mansour Bahrami winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Rod Frawley has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 56/51), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 19/31). Mansour Bahrami has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 52% (W/L 6/2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Rod Frawley has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mansour Bahrami has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rod Frawley winning 1 times and Mansour Bahrami being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Rod Frawley winning 2 and Mansour Bahrami winning 0.
The last match between Rod Frawley and Mansour Bahrami was at the Auckland, 10-01-1977, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Rod Frawley getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rod Frawley has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mansour Bahrami has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rod Frawley has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mansour Bahrami has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Rod Frawley has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mansour Bahrami has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Rod Frawley vs Mansour Bahrami Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Frawley vs M. Bahrami H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Frawley	Stats	M. Bahrami
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Frawley Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Melbourne Indoor - 15-10-1984
R3 Steve ShawS. Shaw	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R4 Brad DrewettB. Drewett	L	6-3 7-6	Stats
Brisbane - 01-10-1984
R3 Eliot TeltscherE. Teltscher	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Auckland - 09-01-1984
R3 Larry StefankiL. Stefanki	L	7-6 6-1	Stats
Adelaide - 19-12-1983
R3 Leif ShirasL. Shiras	L	6-4 7-6	Stats

View All

M. Bahrami Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Basel - 28-09-1992
R1 Andrei ChesnokovA. Chesnokov	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Cologne - 14-09-1992
R1 Jan GunnarssonJ. Gunnarsson	L	5-7 7-5 6-1	Stats
Toulouse - 01-10-1990
R1 Jaime YzagaJ. Yzaga	L	6-4 3-6 6-3	Stats
Basel - 24-09-1990
R1 Marc RossetM. Rosset	W	6-1 5-7 7-6	Stats
R2 Yannick NoahY. Noah	L	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

R. Frawley vs M. Bahrami Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Frawley	Stats	M. Bahrami
46.85% (134/152)	YTD Win/Loss	35.59% (42/76)
46.75% (338/385)	Sets Win/Loss	39.10% (122/190)
48.45% (3358/3573)	Games Win/Loss	45.90% (1387/1635)
51.76% (44/41)	Hard Win/Loss	21.05% (4/15)
38.00% (19/31)	Clay Win/Loss	33.33% (22/44)
34.09% (15/29)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.48% (10/13)
52.34% (56/51)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
569.26	Average Opponent Rank	333.92
54.55% (18/15)	Slam W/L	20.00% (1/4)
100.00% (1/0)	Cups W/L	66.67% (8/4)
41.96% (94/130)	Main Tour W/L	33.33% (21/42)
75.00% (21/7)	Challenger W/L	31.58% (12/26)
47% (114/245)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	33% (33/100)
49% (18/37)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (9/18)
100% (1/1)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
53% (54/102)	Deciding Set Win %	51% (25/49)
79% (114/90)	1st Set Won, Won Match	70% (46/32)
21% (114/24)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	30% (46/14)
25% (168/42)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	14% (72/10)