Richel Hogenkamp vs Jasmine Paolini Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hogenkamp vs Paolini analysis and find out who is favored!
Richel Hogenkamp vs Jasmine Paolini Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hogenkamp has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Paolini has won 48.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hogenkamp, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paolini has won 56.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 39.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hogenkamp has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paolini has saved 54.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hogenkamp has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Paolini winning 62.82% (W/L 49/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hogenkamp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 215/ 132), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 14/ 19). Paolini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 201/ 119), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hogenkamp winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hogenkamp winning 2 and Paolini winning 0. The last match between Hogenkamp and Paolini was at the Clermont-Ferrand, 02-10-2016, Final, I.hard with Richel Hogenkamp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hogenkamp and Paolini have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hogenkamp winning 0 times and Paolini 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hogenkamp winning 0, and Paolini 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hogenkamp has played against opponents with an average rank of while Paolini has played against players with an average rank of 134.99.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hogenkamp has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paolini has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hogenkamp has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paolini has converted 48.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hogenkamp 1 - 0 Paolini
16
Total
0
Mast
12
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
896
Rank
94
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
14
Rank
14
High
28
Age
R
Plays
13
Total
1
Mast
8
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
3
Minor
Form
59% (414-282)
Career Total W/L
58% (367-264)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
63% (12-7)
$542,444
Career Prize Money
$2,141,786
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Richel Hogenkamp | Jasmine Paolini |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 0:57:0 | 0:57:0 |
1st Serve % | 66% (31/47) | 68% (40/59) |
1st Serve Win% | 74% (23/31) | 57% (23/40) |
2nd Serve Win% | 63% (10/16) | 37% (7/19) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 100% (1/1) |
Return Points W% | 49% (29/59) | 30% (14/47) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Jasmine Paolini
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Richel Hogenkamp | Jasmine Paolini |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (12/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (27/17) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (223/202) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.12 |
Aces Total | 0 | 25 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.13 |
DFs Total | 0 | 28 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:39:57 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 169.42 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 69% (921/1343) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 61% (566/921) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (203/422) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 54% (78/145) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (609/1354) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/3) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (12/19) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (10/10) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (10/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Richel Hogenkamp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yuki Naito
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
31 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Carol Zhao
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Christina Rosca
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Salma Djoubri
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Jasmine Paolini Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
Emma Navarro
Player
Jasmine Paolini
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Katie Volynets
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
83%
(
69 of
83)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R4 |
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Jasmine Paolini
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Tatjana Maria
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Sorana Cirstea
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
R3 |
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Maria Sakkari
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Leylah Annie Fernandez
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more