Rethin Pranav Senthil Kumar vs Guhan Rajan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L L L
Form
W L W L W W L L L LH2H: Kumar 1 - 0 Rajan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kumar winning 2 and Rajan winning 0. The last match between Kumar and Rajan was at the M15 Chennai, 02-04-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Rethin Pranav Senthil Kumar getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rethin Pranav Senthil Kumar | 1 |
| Guhan Rajan | 0 |
M15 Chennai(02-04-2023)
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Goffin VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rethin Pranav Senthil Kumar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Nick Chappell
Player
Rethin Pranav Senthil Kumar
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dev Javia
Player
Rethin Pranav Senthil Kumar
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
101)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
Rethin Pranav Senthil Kumar
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
96)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rethin Pranav Senthil Kumar
Player
Egor Agafonov
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-4 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rethin Pranav Senthil Kumar
Player
Raghav Jaisinghani
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Rethin Pranav Senthil Kumar
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
0
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
2
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
26%
(
8 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
51%
(
45 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
47 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
Player
Rethin Pranav Senthil Kumar
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Guhan Rajan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Faisal Qamar
Player
Guhan Rajan
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lohithaksha Bathrinath
Player
Guhan Rajan
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
38%
(
27 of
72)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
11
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stijn Pel
Player
Guhan Rajan
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
46%
(
36 of
79)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Guhan Rajan
Player
Rishi Reddy
40%
(
31 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
6
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 38% (3/5) | Win/Loss | 50% (15/15) |
| 42% (8/11) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (31/33) |
| 48% (83/91) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (305/287) |
| 38% (3/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (12/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 16 | Aces Total | 33 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 16 | Total Double Faults | 72 |
| 1:43:39 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 340.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 43.87 |
| 55% (290/527) | 1st Serve % | 50% (459/927) |
| 63% (184/290) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (310/459) |
| 42% (100/237) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (238/468) |
| 44% (25/57) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (50/95) |
| 43% (206/475) | Return Points Win % | 43% (384/899) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (3/4) | Futures W/L | 50% (15/15) |
| 29% (2/7) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (12/12) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (12/0) |
| 20% (5/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (18/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
