Renzo Olivo vs Nicolas Villalon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Over the last six months, Villalon has demonstrated slightly better performance on their second serve, winning 46.92% of points, compared to Olivo's 45.65%. In terms of return game stats, Villalon has won 45.24% of their opponent's second serve points recently, while Olivo shows a marginal edge with 45.47%. Additionally, their return efficiency on first serves stands at 32.14% for Villalon and 32.71% for Olivo.

When playing under pressure, Villalon has managed to save 52.83% of breakpoints, proving more reliable in critical situations than Olivo, who has saved 48.18%. Villalon's overall match performance in the past year indicates a win rate of 41.86% (W/L 18/25). Conversely, Olivo boasts a 50% win rate (W/L 31/31), painting a comprehensive picture of their head-to-head matchup.

Regarding surface preferences, Villalon wins 49% of their matches on clay (W/L 53/56), whereas performance dips on hard courts to 29% (W/L 2/5). Similarly, Olivo's best surface is clay with a 53% win rate (W/L 416/367), but performance declines on grass courts to 33% (W/L 4/8).

Looking at their level of play, Villalon has mostly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K over the last year, maintaining a 43.59% win rate (W/L 17/22). In contrast, Olivo has competed more frequently in Challengers/ITF tournaments >$10K, securing a 46.81% win rate (W/L 22/25). It’s essential to consider the relative event level each player has engaged in when making predictions.

Villalon's recent encounters with higher-ranked players are reflected through an average opponent rank of 320.21 over the past year, whereas Olivo’s opponents have had a slightly lower average rank of 352.4. Both players offer distinct strengths in deciding sets; Villalon has triumphed in 33% of these situations, while Olivo has captured victory in 63% of deciding sets played over the past year.

When it comes to converting breakpoints, Villalon has been effective recently, converting 43.4% of their opportunities, a clear advantage over Olivo’s 31.28%. Such statistics provide valuable insights, especially when evaluating in-game strategies and betting predictions.

Given these comprehensive statistics, while Olivo demonstrates a slight edge in various performance metrics, Villalon shows potential in pressure situations and breakpoint conversions. However, Olivo’s consistent performance in deciding sets and return points could position them as the more likely victor in this upcoming match.