Prediction of Renata Baranski vs Maider Laval Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Baranski vs M. Laval

Renata Baranski

POL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

116

Best Rank

139

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Maider Laval

FRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

116

Best Rank

139

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Baranski 1 - 0 Laval

They have played 3 sets in total, with Renata Baranski winning 2 and Maider Laval winning 1. The last match between Renata Baranski and Maider Laval was at the Roland Garros, 27-05-1991, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Renata Baranski getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Baranski	1
Laval	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Roland Garros(05-27-91)

Stats

Renata Baranski

Maider Laval

R. Baranski vs M. Laval H2H Profile

R. Baranski	Stats	M. Laval
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
53.58% (142-123)	Career Total W/L	51.48% (87-82)
1	Clay	0
4	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Baranski vs M. Laval Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Renata Baranski has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Maider Laval has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Renata Baranski, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Maider Laval has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Renata Baranski has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maider Laval has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Renata Baranski has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Maider Laval winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Renata Baranski has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 95/74), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/3). Maider Laval has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 60/44), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Renata Baranski has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Maider Laval has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Renata Baranski winning 1 times and Maider Laval being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Renata Baranski winning 2 and Maider Laval winning 1.
The last match between Renata Baranski and Maider Laval was at the Roland Garros, 27-05-1991, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Renata Baranski getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Renata Baranski has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Maider Laval has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Renata Baranski has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maider Laval has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Renata Baranski has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maider Laval has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Renata Baranski vs Maider Laval Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Baranski vs M. Laval H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Baranski	Stats	M. Laval
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	13
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Baranski Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Fayetteville - 14-08-1995
Q1 Lisa WeerasekeraL. Weerasekera	W	6-2 6-0	Stats
ITF Norfolk - 03-07-1995
R4 Audra BrannonA. Brannon	L	1-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
R3 Sylvia SchenckS. Schenck	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
ITF Hilton Head - 26-06-1995
R3 Melissa BeadmanM. Beadman	W	6-2 3-6 6-1	Stats
ITF Peachtree - 19-06-1995
R3 Alix CreekA. Creek	L	6-0 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Laval Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Le Havre - 28-11-1994
R3 Isabelle TaeschI. Taesch	L	6-7(8) 6-3 6-4	Stats
ITF Marseille - 19-09-1994
R3 Marta CanoM. Cano	W	6-1 6-3	Stats
SF Madeline SanchezM. Sanchez	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Immaculada Varas CaroI. Varas	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
R4 Marina Escobar MartinezM. Escobar	W	6-4 2-6 6-4	Stats

View All

R. Baranski vs M. Laval Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Baranski	Stats	M. Laval
53.58% (142/123)	YTD Win/Loss	51.48% (87/82)
52.03% (321/296)	Sets Win/Loss	49.74% (189/191)
50.04% (2791/2786)	Games Win/Loss	49.03% (1685/1752)
56.21% (95/74)	Hard Win/Loss	40.00% (12/18)
54.24% (32/27)	Clay Win/Loss	57.69% (60/44)
36.36% (4/7)	Indoor Hard W/L	57.14% (12/9)
25.00% (1/3)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
476.37	Average Opponent Rank	443.28
70.00% (7/3)	Slam W/L	16.67% (1/5)
63.55% (68/39)	Challenger W/L	63.10% (53/31)
45.45% (10/12)	Futures W/L	25.00% (3/9)
53% (139/262)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	51% (86/168)
100% (1/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
56% (22/39)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	36% (4/11)
55% (49/89)	Deciding Set Win %	63% (27/43)
84% (129/109)	1st Set Won, Won Match	91% (81/74)
16% (129/20)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	9% (81/7)
24% (135/32)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	15% (88/13)