Reese Sager vs Petra Hule Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Jul at 05:26 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Sager vs P. Hule

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sager 1 - 0 Hule
They have played 3 sets in total, with Reese Sager winning 2 and Petra Hule winning 1. The last match between Reese Sager and Petra Hule was at the W75 Lexington, 28-07-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Reese Sager getting the victory 6-0 6-7(4) 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sager | 1 |
| Hule | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W75 Lexington(07-28-25)
R. Sager vs P. Hule H2H Profile
R. Sager vs P. Hule Match Preview:
- How effective is each player's second serve? Recently, Hule has succeeded in winning 36.36% of points on their second serve, while Sager has struggled to gain any points, with 0% success.
- Examining return game performance, Hule has been more effective, securing 53.83% of second serve return points and 35.71% of first serve returns. In contrast, Sager has not won any points on return, with a performance rate of 0%.
- When it comes to handling pressure, such as breakpoints, Hule has shown resilience by saving 45.73% of them. Conversely, Sager has not saved any breakpoints, reflecting a 0% success rate.
- Considering overall match wins over the past year, Hule stands ahead with a 48% match win percentage, compared to Sager's 0% match wins.
- In terms of competing against higher-ranked opponents, Hule's opponents have had an average rank of 376.58, which is noteworthy for assessing competition levels.
- How well do both players perform in crucial, deciding sets? Hule has a 50% success rate in deciding sets over the past year, whereas Sager has not secured any victories in such scenarios, with a 0% rate.
- What about converting breakpoints? Hule has converted 50% of them, demonstrating an ability to seize opportunities, while Sager has failed to convert any, at 0% efficiency.
Editorial Prediction (July 28, 2025, UTC):
When comparing the recent form between Sager and Hule, it is evident that Hule holds a significant advantage in several key performance areas, particularly in second serve points and return games.
Hule's capacity to secure breakpoints and maintain composure under pressure surpasses that of Sager. Furthermore, Hule's win record and experience against higher-ranked players further emphasizes their edge in this matchup.
Given these statistics and trends, the likelihood of Hule emerging victorious in the upcoming tennis match is strong, making them the favorite to win based on current performance indicators.
Reese Sager vs Petra Hule Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Sager vs P. Hule H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 9 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 2:10:55 | Average Match Time | 2:10:55 |
| 58% (49/85) | 1st Serve % | 55% (51/93) |
| 61% (30/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (30/51) |
| 47% (17/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (12/42) |
| 56% (9/16) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (4/12) |
| 55% (51/93) | Return Points Win % | 45% (38/85) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Sager Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 7-5 1-6 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 | ||
P. Hule Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 2-2 ret. | ||

R. Sager vs P. Hule Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.00% (1/1) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.21% (106/101) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.51% (239/225) |
| 58.18% (32/23) | Games Win/Loss | 50.91% (2146/2069) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.67% (76/74) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.38% (19/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 3 | Aces Total | 209 |
| 0.52 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 14 | Total Double Faults | 771 |
| 2:10:16 | Average Match Time | 1:24:48 |
| 569.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 424.58 |
| 59% (106/180) | 1st Serve % | 69% (8352/12052) |
| 68% (72/106) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (4968/8352) |
| 42% (31/74) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1592/3700) |
| 45% (13/29) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (732/1470) |
| 50% (99/200) | Return Points Win % | 46% (5419/11760) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Challenger W/L | 52.46% (96/87) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 47.62% (10/11) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (104/203) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (18/39) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (23/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (104/93) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (104/11) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (103/13) |