Rebeka Masarova vs Sara Bejlek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Apr at 07:31 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Masarova vs S. Bejlek

SUI
2
Win
Played
0
Win

CZE
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Masarova 2 - 0 Bejlek
They have played 6 sets in total, with Rebeka Masarova winning 4 and Sara Bejlek winning 2. The last match between Rebeka Masarova and Sara Bejlek was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 22-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Rebeka Masarova getting the victory 6-2 5-7 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Masarova | 2 |
| Bejlek | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(04-22-25)
(Q3) Berlin Ladies Open - Berlin(06-16-24)
R. Masarova vs S. Bejlek H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $970,424 | Career Prize Money | $741,721 |
| 62.41% (264-159) | Career Total W/L | 68.12% (156-73) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 10 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 55.56% (5-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.86% (3-4) |
R. Masarova vs S. Bejlek Match Preview:
When evaluating the second serve performance over the past six months, Masarova has demonstrated an ability to secure 39.91% of points, which slightly edges out Bejlek, who has managed to win 38.04% of such points. This particular statistic is often utilized for predicting match outcomes due to its high correlation with performance.
In terms of return game statistics, the recent form indicates that Masarova has won 48.77% of her opponents' second-serve points compared to Bejlek's 48.02%. However, Bejlek has a stronger performance on first serve returns, recording 35.85% against Masarova's 29.43%. These figures carry significant weight in forecasting who might be favored in their head-to-head matchup.
Breaking down performances under pressure, Masarova has saved 51.55% of breakpoints recently, surpassing Bejlek who has saved 47.43%. This statistic is particularly relevant for in-game betting predictions, providing insight into how each player might handle crucial moments during the match.
An analysis of their performance over the last year reveals that Masarova has won 49.06% of her matches with a win-loss record of 26/27, whereas Bejlek has been more successful, claiming victory in 65.96% of her encounters, with a record of 31/16. These figures suggest a slight edge for Bejlek when assessing overall head-to-head predictions.
Looking at career surface preference, Masarova excels on clay, boasting a 66% win rate (134/69), while her performance on grass drops to 38% (5/8). Bejlek also favors clay with a 71% win rate (104/43) but struggles more on grass, securing only 20% (1/4) of her matches. This shared preference for clay could impact their performance depending on the surface they're contesting.
The players' experience and success in tournaments reveal that Masarova, over the past year, has mostly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of her matches (9/8). Bejlek, competing at the same level, has been more effective with a win rate of 67.86% (19/9). This context is crucial when considering how they might perform against each other.
In direct head-to-head encounters, Masarova has a slight advantage, having claimed victory in their only meeting thus far. This match was played on grass during the Berlin Ladies Open, where Masarova emerged victorious in a tightly contested battle, winning 6-7(4), 6-4, 7-6(3). Notably, their matches have typically been prolonged, averaging 2 hours and 35 minutes.
Given their past encounters, Masarova and Bejlek have played three sets once, with Masarova winning this one as well. Both players have split the tiebreakers they have contested, highlighting the competitiveness between them. If the match goes into a deciding set, Masarova wins 48% of those played in the past year, while Bejlek has a slightly better rate, winning 60%.
The quality of opponents faced over the last 12 months is another factor, with Masarova encountering players averaging a rank of 154.15, while Bejlek faced players ranked around 194.68. This might suggest a more challenging competition for Masarova during this period.
Finally, considering their recent breakpoint conversion statistics, Masarova has converted 31.25% of opportunities, while Bejlek has capitalized on 44.83% of chances. This suggests Bejlek might have an advantage when it comes to seizing critical moments. Taking all these factors into account, although both players demonstrate strengths, the statistics lean toward Bejlek being the likely victor in this upcoming match.
Rebeka Masarova vs Sara Bejlek Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Masarova vs S. Bejlek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 36 | Games Won | 28 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 14 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:17:38 | Average Match Time | 2:17:38 |
| 59% (122/207) | 1st Serve % | 75% (156/209) |
| 70% (85/122) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (91/156) |
| 48% (41/85) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (24/53) |
| 62% (13/21) | Break Pts Won % | 47% (9/19) |
| 45% (94/209) | Return Points Win % | 39% (81/207) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Masarova Recent Matches Played
S. Bejlek Recent Matches Played

R. Masarova vs S. Bejlek Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.41% (264/159) | YTD Win/Loss | 68.12% (156/73) |
| 60.16% (592/392) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.33% (335/194) |
| 54.08% (4927/4183) | Games Win/Loss | 55.37% (2692/2170) |
| 61.15% (85/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.33% (28/20) |
| 66.51% (145/73) | Clay Win/Loss | 72.16% (127/49) |
| 52.38% (22/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (12/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 1470 | Aces Total | 82 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1490 | Total Double Faults | 600 |
| 1:30:28 | Average Match Time | 1:36:9 |
| 389.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 334.06 |
| 62% (17094/27456) | 1st Serve % | 72% (11364/15710) |
| 66% (11315/17094) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (6583/11364) |
| 46% (4766/10362) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2030/4346) |
| 47% (1460/3137) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (1123/2162) |
| 44% (11963/27015) | Return Points Win % | 49% (7602/15402) |
| 48.48% (16/17) | Slam W/L | 61.29% (19/12) |
| 50.00% (22/22) | Masters W/L | 70.00% (7/3) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.16% (41/32) | Main Tour W/L | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 63.98% (119/67) | Challenger W/L | 70.66% (118/49) |
| 76.47% (65/20) | Futures W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 62% (256/410) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (153/225) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 62% (67/108) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (30/50) |
| 52% (77/149) | Deciding Set Win % | 66% (47/71) |
| 83% (263/217) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (142/131) |
| 17% (263/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (142/10) |
| 29% (160/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (87/25) |