Rebeka Masarova vs Nina Stojanovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Jun at 03:54 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Masarova vs N. Stojanovic

SUI
0
Win
Played
1
Win

SRB
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Masarova 0 - 1 Stojanovic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rebeka Masarova winning 0 and Nina Stojanovic winning 2. The last match between Nina Stojanovic and Rebeka Masarova was at the Wimbledon - London, 25-06-2025, Round: Q2, Surface: Grass, with Nina Stojanovic getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Masarova | 0 |
| Stojanovic | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q2) Wimbledon - London(06-25-25)
R. Masarova vs N. Stojanovic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $970,424 | Career Prize Money | $442,333 |
| 62.41% (264-159) | Career Total W/L | 59.75% (285-192) |
| 0 | Grass | 1 |
| 6 | Titles | 12 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 55.56% (5-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-4) |
R. Masarova vs N. Stojanovic Match Preview:
- How important is second serve performance in predicting match outcomes? Masarova's recent form shows a 41.3% win rate on second serves, slightly surpassing Stojanovic's 41.05%.
- Stojanovic has a stronger return game, securing 52.03% of points on opponents' second serves compared to Masarova's 48.82%.
- When it comes to first serve returns, Stojanovic leads with 32.5% versus Masarova's 29.24%.
- Under pressure, Stojanovic saves 53.92% of breakpoints, whereas Masarova saves 50.92%.
- In terms of match wins this past year, Stojanovic holds a 62% win rate, slightly better than Masarova's 57.38%.
- What's the preferred surface for each player? Both excel on clay, with Masarova at 67% and Stojanovic at 62% win rates, but they have differing weaknesses on indoor hard and grass respectively.
- Stojanovic has faced less formidable opponents ranked at an average of 202.8, compared to Masarova's average opponent rank of 127.69.
- In deciding sets, Stojanovic has a notable edge, winning 72% of them, while Masarova wins 56%.
- During breakpoint opportunities, Stojanovic converts them into breaks 41% of the time, outperforming Masarova's 30.14% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (June 25, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance and key statistics between Masarova and Stojanovic, some clear patterns emerge.
Stojanovic's effectiveness in return games and her aptitude for saving breakpoints provide her an edge, particularly against higher-ranked opponents. Her superior performance in deciding sets indicates resilience in tight match situations.
While Masarova showcases a slightly stronger second serve under pressure, her ability to convert breakpoints is not as strong as Stojanovic's, potentially putting her at a disadvantage when seizing game-changing opportunities.
Given Stojanovic's overall stronger statistics in critical areas and her better track record in deciding sets, she is favored to win this upcoming match.
Rebeka Masarova vs Nina Stojanovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Masarova vs N. Stojanovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 9 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:44:0 | Average Match Time | 1:44:0 |
| 60% (43/72) | 1st Serve % | 61% (49/80) |
| 60% (26/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (34/49) |
| 45% (13/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (14/31) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (4/11) |
| 40% (32/80) | Return Points Win % | 46% (33/72) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Masarova Recent Matches Played
N. Stojanovic Recent Matches Played

R. Masarova vs N. Stojanovic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.41% (264/159) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.75% (285/192) |
| 60.16% (592/392) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.66% (636/467) |
| 54.08% (4927/4183) | Games Win/Loss | 53.18% (5428/4779) |
| 61.15% (85/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.57% (149/93) |
| 66.51% (145/73) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.18% (97/59) |
| 52.38% (22/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.25% (33/34) |
| 50.00% (12/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (6/6) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1470 | Aces Total | 983 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 1490 | Total Double Faults | 1572 |
| 1:30:28 | Average Match Time | 1:14:35 |
| 394.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 481.16 |
| 62% (17094/27456) | 1st Serve % | 58% (14483/24844) |
| 66% (11315/17094) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (9398/14483) |
| 46% (4766/10362) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4696/10349) |
| 47% (1460/3137) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1461/3102) |
| 44% (11963/27015) | Return Points Win % | 45% (11451/25219) |
| 48.48% (16/17) | Slam W/L | 38.71% (12/19) |
| 50.00% (22/22) | Masters W/L | 77.78% (7/2) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 20.00% (2/8) |
| 56.16% (41/32) | Main Tour W/L | 50.65% (39/38) |
| 63.98% (119/67) | Challenger W/L | 63.27% (174/101) |
| 76.47% (65/20) | Futures W/L | 68.00% (51/24) |
| 62% (256/410) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (282/471) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 62% (67/108) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (54/109) |
| 52% (77/149) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (85/153) |
| 83% (263/217) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (280/239) |
| 17% (263/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (280/40) |
| 29% (160/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (197/45) |