Rebecca Sramkova vs Lucrezia Stefanini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Mar at 07:21 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Sramkova vs L. Stefanini

SVK
2
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sramkova 2 - 0 Stefanini
They have played 6 sets in total, with Rebecca Sramkova winning 4 and Lucrezia Stefanini winning 2. The last match between Rebecca Sramkova and Lucrezia Stefanini was at the Miami Open - Miami, 18-03-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Rebecca Sramkova getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sramkova | 2 |
| Stefanini | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Miami Open - Miami(03-18-25)
(R1) Polish Open - Kozerki(08-07-23)
R. Sramkova vs L. Stefanini H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,236,989 | Career Prize Money | $621,632 |
| 60.55% (439-286) | Career Total W/L | 56.56% (345-265) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 14 | Titles | 10 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 44.90% (22-27) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (2-6) |
R. Sramkova vs L. Stefanini Match Preview:
How do we assess who is more likely to take the win in the clash between Stefanini and Sramkova? Delving into recent form, notably over their second serve performance, Stefanini has managed to claim 37.15% of the points in the last six months. In comparison, Sramkova edges ahead with 41.71% of the points won. This subtle difference could play a pivotal role in the match outcome, as second serve statistics are often crucial indicators of success.
Let's turn our attention to return game stats, which offer another lens through which to evaluate these players. Stefanini excels in this regard, boasting a 54.45% success rate in winning her opponent's second serve points, whereas Sramkova trails at 47%. Furthermore, when it comes to first serve returns, Stefanini again has an upper hand with 39.13% over Sramkova's 31.72%. These figures strongly suggest that return game performance could be a decisive factor in determining the favorite.
Under pressure, both players display resilience, but there's a slight edge for Sramkova. While Stefanini saves 47.99% of breakpoints, Sramkova edges it at 49.53%. The importance of these stats becomes apparent when considering live betting predictions, especially in those high-stakes moments.
The wider performance overview shows minimal differences, with Stefanini winning 60.56% of matches over the last year, while Sramkova comes up slightly ahead with 61.19%. Notably, these figures reveal the consistent nature of their win rates across various tournaments.
Surface preferences play a significant role in predicting outcomes as well. Stefanini shines brightest on Hard courts, with a win percentage of 64%, whereas her performance dips to 53% on Grass. Sramkova, however, thrives on Clay, winning 65% of her matches on this surface, while her effectiveness drops to 55% on Hard courts. These stats depict their potential performance on differing surfaces.
The level of competition faced by each player cannot be ignored. While Stefanini has predominately contested in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 63.83% of matches, Sramkova has battled on the Main tour, claiming victory in 66.67% of encounters. This context is critical for understanding why certain statistics may favor one player over another.
Historically in head-to-head matchups, Sramkova holds the upper hand with one victory, while Stefanini is yet to notch a win. Their previous face-off at the Polish Open witnessed Sramkova's triumph in three sets, lasting an average match duration of 2:38:50, suggesting Sramkova could have the mental edge in endurance-based situations.
Analyzing break point conversion rates, Stefanini has a notable success with 44.14% of breaks converted, eclipsing Sramkova's 36.2%. With both players yet to engage in a tiebreak against one another, this could point towards Stefanini having a slight advantage under pressure.
Lastly, against a backdrop of opponent quality, Stefanini has faced competitors averaging a rank of 240.92, while Sramkova has consistently battled higher-caliber players, with an average rank of 104.61. Coupled with Sramkova's superior performance in deciding sets, winning 65% of them compared to Stefanini's 57%, the scales slightly tip in favor of Sramkova clinching this match if the pressure builds. Thus, based on these comprehensive statistics, Sramkova appears poised as the stronger contender entering this encounter.
Rebecca Sramkova vs Lucrezia Stefanini Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Sramkova vs L. Stefanini H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 32 | Games Won | 23 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:13:40 | Average Match Time | 2:13:40 |
| 67% (119/178) | 1st Serve % | 71% (125/176) |
| 65% (77/119) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (71/125) |
| 49% (29/59) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (25/51) |
| 55% (12/22) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (7/21) |
| 45% (80/176) | Return Points Win % | 40% (72/178) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Sramkova Recent Matches Played
L. Stefanini Recent Matches Played

R. Sramkova vs L. Stefanini Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.55% (439/286) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.46% (345/266) |
| 58.26% (980/702) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.59% (771/616) |
| 53.15% (8352/7362) | Games Win/Loss | 52.75% (6633/5941) |
| 54.09% (86/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.76% (123/73) |
| 64.17% (240/134) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.48% (169/147) |
| 59.51% (97/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.52% (38/33) |
| 55.17% (16/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.57% (15/13) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 1681 | Aces Total | 242 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1524 | Total Double Faults | 1528 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:33:21 |
| 434.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 460.67 |
| 58% (21468/36983) | 1st Serve % | 72% (27174/37924) |
| 64% (13837/21468) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (15335/27174) |
| 47% (7228/15515) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (4738/10751) |
| 45% (2055/4528) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (2654/5156) |
| 45% (16367/36695) | Return Points Win % | 49% (18108/36690) |
| 48.21% (27/29) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (17/17) |
| 54.05% (20/17) | Masters W/L | 30.77% (4/9) |
| 50.00% (6/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.55% (46/45) | Main Tour W/L | 50.79% (32/31) |
| 61.81% (259/160) | Challenger W/L | 57.31% (200/149) |
| 73.64% (81/29) | Futures W/L | 60.93% (92/59) |
| 60% (431/715) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (337/596) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 56% (96/170) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (59/119) |
| 55% (129/234) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (91/180) |
| 86% (434/374) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (335/294) |
| 14% (434/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (335/40) |
| 22% (291/64) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (274/47) |