Rebecca Sramkova vs Joanna Garland Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Oct at 04:31 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Sramkova vs J. Garland

SVK
1
Win
Played
0
Win

TPE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sramkova 1 - 0 Garland
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rebecca Sramkova winning 2 and Joanna Garland winning 0. The last match between Rebecca Sramkova and Joanna Garland was at the Japan Open - Osaka, 14-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Rebecca Sramkova getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sramkova | 1 |
| Garland | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Japan Open - Osaka(10-14-25)
R. Sramkova vs J. Garland H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,236,989 | Career Prize Money | $138,755 |
| 60.55% (439-286) | Career Total W/L | 68.00% (272-128) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 14 | Titles | 16 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 44.90% (22-27) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (3-6) |
R. Sramkova vs J. Garland Match Preview:
- In recent months, Rebecca Sramkova's second serve has been more effective, winning 44.52% of points, compared to Joanna Garland’s 38.58%. Could this serve advantage predict a match winner? It might.
- Their return stats are nearly identical. For second serve returns, Garland has a slight deficit compared to Sramkova: 48.37% versus 48.76%. What about first serve returns? They are almost even, with Garland at 30.80% and Sramkova at 30.84%.
- Sramkova saves a higher percentage of breakpoints, standing at 51.37%, which may suggest a slight advantage under pressure, compared to Garland's 49.17%.
- A glance at their last year’s performances shows that Garland has a superior win rate at 79.59%, while Sramkova stands at 48.21%. How does this compare in terms of competitiveness? It significantly favors Garland.
- Garland excels on Hard courts with a 71% win record, whereas Sramkova's strength lies in Clay, also with a 71% win rate. Interestingly, Sramkova's weaker performance appears on Hard courts.
- Garland dominates in Challengers/ITF tournaments with an 83.33% win rate. Contrastingly, Sramkova competes mostly on the Main tour, with a 55.17% success rate.
- Examining opponent quality, Sramkova typically faces stronger opponents, averaging ranks of 95.64, while Garland's opponents average 359.66.
- In deciding set scenarios, Garland has a remarkable 80% win rate over the last year, outperforming Sramkova, who stands at 65%.
Editorial Prediction (October 13, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze their recent performance patterns, Joanna Garland showcases a superior overall match win rate and an exceptional ability to win deciding sets, suggesting resilience in crucial moments.
Rebecca Sramkova demonstrates a slightly stronger recent second serve and breakpoint save rate, though Garland has been more dominant in her preferred tournament settings.
While Sramkova contends with tougher opponents, this factors into Garland's higher win rate, particularly on his favored Hard surface.
Considering these data points, Joanna Garland appears to hold the edge in this upcoming matchup, being the likely candidate to emerge victorious.
Rebecca Sramkova vs Joanna Garland Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Sramkova vs J. Garland H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:9:54 | Average Match Time | 1:9:54 |
| 67% (32/48) | 1st Serve % | 57% (26/46) |
| 91% (29/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (12/26) |
| 50% (8/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (11/20) |
| 100% (4/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (23/46) | Return Points Win % | 23% (11/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Sramkova Recent Matches Played
J. Garland Recent Matches Played

R. Sramkova vs J. Garland Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.55% (439/286) | YTD Win/Loss | 68.00% (272/128) |
| 58.26% (980/702) | Sets Win/Loss | 65.54% (580/305) |
| 53.15% (8352/7362) | Games Win/Loss | 57.66% (4570/3356) |
| 54.09% (86/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 69.92% (165/71) |
| 64.17% (240/134) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.57% (40/21) |
| 59.51% (97/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.63% (53/29) |
| 55.17% (16/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 66.67% (14/7) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1681 | Aces Total | 851 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1524 | Total Double Faults | 1126 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:36:31 |
| 430.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 445.11 |
| 58% (21468/36983) | 1st Serve % | 62% (14511/23492) |
| 64% (13837/21468) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (9496/14511) |
| 47% (7228/15515) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4388/8981) |
| 45% (2055/4528) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1582/3291) |
| 45% (16367/36695) | Return Points Win % | 48% (11474/24053) |
| 48.21% (27/29) | Slam W/L | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 54.05% (20/17) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 50.00% (6/6) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 50.55% (46/45) | Main Tour W/L | 45.45% (5/6) |
| 61.81% (259/160) | Challenger W/L | 68.20% (178/83) |
| 73.64% (81/29) | Futures W/L | 72.22% (78/30) |
| 60% (431/715) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (268/395) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 56% (96/170) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (33/65) |
| 55% (129/234) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (48/88) |
| 86% (434/374) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (257/241) |
| 14% (434/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (257/16) |
| 22% (291/64) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (143/30) |