Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rebecca Sramkova vs Anna Gabric Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sramkova vs Gabric analysis and find out who is favored!
Rebecca Sramkova vs Anna Gabric Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sramkova has won 45.6% of points on his second serve, while Gabric has won 45.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sramkova, in recent form, has won 58.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gabric has won 60.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.49% and 42.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sramkova has saved 53.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gabric has saved 54.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sramkova has won 62.32% of matches played (W/L 43/ 26), with Gabric winning 63.33% (W/L 38/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sramkova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 227/ 124), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 54/ 49). Gabric has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 133/ 90), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 17/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Sramkova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.39% of matches (W/L 31/ 15), where as Gabric has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.91% of matches (W/L 37/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sramkova winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sramkova winning 2 and Gabric winning 0. The last match between Sramkova and Gabric was at the W60 Prague, 01-09-2021, First, Clay with Rebecca Sramkova getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sramkova and Gabric have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sramkova winning 0 times and Gabric 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sramkova winning 0, and Gabric 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sramkova has played against opponents with an average rank of 218.2 while Gabric has played against players with an average rank of 236.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sramkova has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gabric has won 37% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sramkova has converted 48.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gabric has converted 47.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sramkova 1 - 0 Gabric
116
Rank
111
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
426
Rank
425
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
61% (384-244)
Career Total W/L
57% (167-125)
61% (14-9)
YTD W/L
56% (10-8)
$505,848
Career Prize Money
$2,650
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Rebecca Sramkova | Anna Gabric |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:0 | 1:56:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (45/79) | 66% (45/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (27/45) | 51% (23/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (17/34) | 35% (8/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (6/13) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (37/68) | 44% (35/79) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Anna Gabric
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rebecca Sramkova | Anna Gabric |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (14/9) | 56% (10/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (31/22) | 61% (27/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (270/241) | 55% (226/186) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 86% (6/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 63 | 37 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 48 | 79 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:2 | 1:55:26 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 215.09 | 219.72 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1036/1669) | 67% (894/1343) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (658/1036) | 62% (558/894) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (299/633) | 46% (208/449) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (98/211) | 47% (90/191) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (788/1738) | 48% (703/1450) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 73% (8/3) | 60% (9/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (13/22) | 56% (10/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 13% (1/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (13/11) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (13/2) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 14% (7/1) |
Rebecca Sramkova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
42%
(
15 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Clara Tauson
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
51%
(
21 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
47
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(6) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
42%
(
42 of
100)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
45%
(
26 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
51 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Leolia Jeanjean
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Schmiedlova
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Rebeka Masarova
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Yafan Wang
44%
(
23 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Anna Gabric Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Anna Gabric
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
102)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
48 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Gabric
Player
Julia Grabher
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Gabric
Player
Sonja Zhiyenbayeva
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Gabric
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
70%
(
76 of
109)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kayla Day
Player
Anna Gabric
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Gabric
Player
Costanza Traversi
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tayisiya Morderger
Player
Anna Gabric
58%
(
59 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Gabric
Player
Chiara Talleri
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denise Valente
Player
Anna Gabric
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denislava Glushkova
Player
Anna Gabric
59%
(
88 of
150)
1st Serve %
72%
(
84 of
117)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
6
48%
(
42 of
88)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
40%
(
25 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
Break Points Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
55%
(
83 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
64 of
117)
131
Total Points Won
136
|
7-5 5-7 7-6(13) | H2H | ||
view more
Sramkova Vs Gabric Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
