Ray Ho vs Anton Chekhov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Ho vs A. Chekhov

Ray Ho
TPE
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
33
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
893
C. Rank
0
715
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Anton Chekhov
RUS
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
33
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
893
C. Rank
0
715
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Ho 1 - 0 Chekhov
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ray Ho winning 2 and Anton Chekhov winning 1. The last match between Ray Ho and Anton Chekhov was at the Pakistan F3 (Islamabad), 17-12-2018, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Ray Ho getting the victory 4-6 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ho | 1 |
| Chekhov | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Pakistan F3 (Islamabad)(12-17-18)
Ray Ho
4
6
7
Anton Chekhov
6
4
5
R. Ho vs A. Chekhov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 49.82% (136-137) | Career Total W/L | 44.86% (96-118) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Ho vs A. Chekhov Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ray Ho has won 59.76% of points on their second serve, while Anton Chekhov has won 39.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ray Ho, in recent form, has won 36.11% of their opponent's second serve points, while Anton Chekhov has won 50.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.39% and 25.49% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ray Ho has saved 56.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Anton Chekhov has saved 53.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ray Ho has won 11.11% of matches played (W/L 1/8), with Anton Chekhov winning 64.71% (W/L 11/6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ray Ho has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 31/28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/3). Anton Chekhov has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 46/47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 8/13).
- Player level: In the last year, Ray Ho has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 11.11% of matches (W/L 1/8), where as Anton Chekhov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 11/6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ray Ho winning 1 times and Anton Chekhov being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ray Ho winning 2 and Anton Chekhov winning 1.
- The last match between Ray Ho and Anton Chekhov was at the Pakistan F3 (Islamabad), 17-12-2018, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Ray Ho getting the victory 4-6 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:47:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ray Ho has played against opponents with an average rank of 336.22 while Anton Chekhov has played against players with an average rank of 98.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ray Ho has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Anton Chekhov has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ray Ho has converted 23.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Anton Chekhov has converted 32.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ray Ho vs Anton Chekhov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Ho vs A. Chekhov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 15 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:47:0 | Average Match Time | 2:47:0 |
| 68% (77/113) | 1st Serve % | 66% (61/92) |
| 61% (47/77) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (40/61) |
| 47% (17/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (16/31) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (4/14) |
| 39% (36/92) | Return Points Win % | 43% (49/113) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Ho 55%, Chekhov 44%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Ho 45%, Chekhov 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Ho 68%, Chekhov 57%.
R. Ho Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
A. Chekhov Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 4-6 6-1 10-6 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||

R. Ho vs A. Chekhov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.82% (136/137) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.86% (96/118) |
| 49.25% (297/306) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.46% (223/257) |
| 51.83% (2935/2728) | Games Win/Loss | 48.57% (2102/2226) |
| 49.76% (103/104) | Hard Win/Loss | 49.46% (46/47) |
| 52.54% (31/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.84% (41/57) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39.13% (9/14) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1137 | Aces Total | 250 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 425 | Total Double Faults | 412 |
| 1:18:49 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 451.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 337.71 |
| 62% (9156/14677) | 1st Serve % | 61% (3705/6108) |
| 70% (6398/9156) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2320/3705) |
| 51% (2831/5521) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1073/2403) |
| 39% (511/1318) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (264/628) |
| 37% (5460/14696) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2595/6429) |
| 25.64% (10/29) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/16) |
| 53.85% (126/108) | Futures W/L | 48.48% (96/102) |
| 49% (130/266) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (95/213) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 34% (23/68) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (14/34) |
| 50% (31/62) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (21/53) |
| 86% (139/119) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (101/81) |
| 14% (139/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (101/20) |
| 10% (134/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (113/15) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction02:45 PM 20/11/25
Prediction01:55 PM 20/11/25
Prediction02:35 PM 20/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 21/11/25
Prediction01:25 PM 20/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Noma Akugue Noha Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Miho Kuramochi Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Miriam Bianca Bulgaru vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Filip Misolic Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
14:35
H2H 0-2
17:00
H2H 0-0
17:00
H2H 0-0
20:00
H2H 0-0
20:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP-CZE
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal