Raphael Perot vs Arthur Gea Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does second serve performance differ? Gea has won 40.27% of points on their second serve recently, compared to Perot's 41.34%.
• When it comes to return games, Gea has an edge by winning 46.81% of their opponents' second serve points, whereas Perot wins 42.28%.
• First serve returns are almost neck and neck: Gea is at 29.56% and Perot slightly ahead at 30.41%.
• Do they play well under pressure? Gea has saved 46.84% of breakpoints recently, while Perot performs better under pressure, saving 48.91%.
• Performance overview indicates Gea has won 61.11% of their matches over the past year, whereas Perot has been more successful, winning 76.47%.
• Both players excel on Hard surfaces, but Perot's win percentage is notably superior at 92% compared to Gea's 76%. Both players show reduced winning percentages on Clay, with Perot again having the advantage.
• Perot has competed mostly on the Futures/Satellites/ITF circuits, winning 76.47% of matches, suggesting higher success at that level compared to Gea, who competes more at Challengers/ITF and has a win rate of 40%.
• Gea has faced opponents with a stronger average rank (367.99) in the past year compared to Perot's opponents (average rank 404.82), indicating tougher competition.
• In matches going to a deciding set, Perot has a stronger record, winning 50% compared to Gea's 37%.
• Gea is more effective in breakpoint opportunities, converting 39.04% of chances, whereas Perot has a slightly lower conversion rate of 34.95%.

Editorial Prediction (June 4, 2025, UTC):

In assessing the upcoming match between Gea and Perot, it is evident that both players have their distinct strengths and weaknesses. Upon examining second serve performance, Perot holds a marginal benefit over Gea, indicating slightly better service consistency.

In return games, Gea appears stronger, especially when contesting second serves. This might give Gea an advantage in breaking Perot's serve more frequently.

The comparative performance under pressure and breakpoint opportunities shows Gea’s stronger breakpoint conversion capability might grant them crucial games, particularly in high-stakes scenarios.

Nevertheless, Perot’s overall match win percentage over the past year and superior Hard surface win rate signals a player in better form, highlighted further by a better record in deciding sets.

Given the facts, Perot appears to be the likely winner of the upcoming match, benefiting from a combination of historical form, surface specialization, and psychological endurance in critical moments.