Ranah Akua Stoiber vs Mingge Xu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 11:15 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Akua Stoiber vs M. Xu

GBR
0
Win
Played
2
Win

GBR
0
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Stoiber 0 - 2 Xu
They have played 4 sets in total, with Ranah Akua Stoiber winning 0 and Mingge Xu winning 4. The last match between Mingge Xu and Ranah Akua Stoiber was at the W75 Glasgow, 30-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Mingge Xu getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stoiber | 0 |
| Xu | 2 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) W75 Glasgow(10-30-25)
(R1) W100 Shrewsbury(10-16-24)
R. A. Stoiber vs M. Xu H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $6,603 | Career Prize Money | $4,160 |
| 54.55% (78-65) | Career Total W/L | 60.42% (58-38) |
| 0 | Indoor | 2 |
| 1 | Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (1-3) |
R. A. Stoiber vs M. Xu Match Preview:
- Ranah Akua Stoiber has a stronger second serve performance in recent form, winning 46.81% of points compared to Mingge Xu's 38.41%. Does this give Stoiber an edge in consistency? It likely does.
- In return games, Stoiber has won 50.87% of opponents' second serve points, while Xu fares slightly better at 52.48%, suggesting Xu might handle pressure on opponents' second serves better.
- Regarding first serve returns, Stoiber leads slightly with 32.52%, against Xu's 30.90%. Could Stoiber gain a slight advantage here? Possibly.
- Under pressure, Stoiber has saved 51.89% of breakpoints, whereas Xu has saved 45.29%, hinting at stronger mental resilience in tight situations for Stoiber.
- Overall, Xu has won 66.67% of matches over the last year, surpassing Stoiber’s 59.38%. Does this suggest Xu is in better form overall? It appears so.
- Both players excel on different surfaces; Stoiber is better on Hard courts, and Xu on Indoor Hard courts. The match surface could be crucial.
- In high-level tournaments, Xu has a better win rate at 71.05% compared to Stoiber’s 54.90%, indicating higher performance in competitive settings.
- In their direct encounters, Xu has won their only meeting, possibly hinting at a psychological advantage.
- Xu has faced tougher opponents, with an average ranking of 364.17 compared to Stoiber's opponents at 397.61, indicating Xu might be more battle-tested.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Xu's 62% win rate suggests a slight advantage over Stoiber's 53%.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent performance statistics, Ranah Akua Stoiber shows strength in second serve points and under pressure, which could provide an edge in maintaining consistency during the match.
However, Mingge Xu demonstrates better overall match win rates, a stronger track record in return games, and a higher success rate against tougher opponents. Xu’s ability to handle decisive moments, along with a psychological advantage from their previous encounter, positions her as a formidable opponent.
Given the analyzed data, Mingge Xu appears slightly more likely to secure a victory in the upcoming match.
Ranah Akua Stoiber vs Mingge Xu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. A. Stoiber vs M. Xu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 10 | Games Won | 24 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:9:21 | Average Match Time | 1:9:21 |
| 58% (61/105) | 1st Serve % | 61% (58/95) |
| 57% (35/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (45/58) |
| 45% (20/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 65% (24/37) |
| 33% (1/3) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (8/12) |
| 27% (26/95) | Return Points Win % | 48% (50/105) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. A. Stoiber Recent Matches Played
M. Xu Recent Matches Played

R. A. Stoiber vs M. Xu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.55% (78/65) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.42% (58/38) |
| 55.05% (180/147) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.55% (131/89) |
| 51.80% (1569/1460) | Games Win/Loss | 54.11% (1060/899) |
| 58.57% (41/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.22% (30/16) |
| 58.33% (7/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.38% (22/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67.65% (23/11) |
| 42.11% (8/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 31.25% (5/11) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 478 | Aces Total | 296 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 250 | Total Double Faults | 366 |
| 1:35:54 | Average Match Time | 1:35:56 |
| 399.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 423.03 |
| 57% (5243/9168) | 1st Serve % | 58% (3506/6000) |
| 66% (3483/5243) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2287/3506) |
| 47% (1855/3925) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1134/2494) |
| 45% (460/1026) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (375/763) |
| 43% (3828/8954) | Return Points Win % | 46% (2786/6080) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 51.92% (54/50) | Challenger W/L | 64.56% (51/28) |
| 67.65% (23/11) | Futures W/L | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 55% (76/138) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (58/95) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (18/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (7/12) |
| 45% (20/44) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (14/29) |
| 86% (76/65) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (58/49) |
| 14% (76/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (58/9) |
| 21% (67/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (38/9) |