Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Radek Stepanek vs Daniel Brands Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stepanek vs Brands analysis and find out who is favored!
Radek Stepanek vs Daniel Brands Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stepanek has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Brands has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stepanek, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Brands has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stepanek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brands has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stepanek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Brands winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stepanek has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 106/ 56), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 191/ 154). Brands has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 112/ 85), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 165/ 141).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Stepanek winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Stepanek winning 4 and Brands winning 3. The last match between Stepanek and Brands was at the BMW Open - Munich, 26-04-2015, Q2 round, Clay with Radek Stepanek getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stepanek and Brands have played a deciding set 1 times, with Stepanek winning 1 times and Brands 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Stepanek winning 1, and Brands 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stepanek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Brands has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stepanek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brands has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stepanek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brands has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stepanek 2 - 1 Brands
Ret.
Rank
8
High
45
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
51
High
36
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
60% (589-396)
Career Total W/L
56% (482-380)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,545,979
Career Prize Money
$765,635
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Radek Stepanek | Daniel Brands |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 39 | 32 |
| Aces (Total) | 22 | 23 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:59 | 1:29:59 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (135/194) | 74% (162/220) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (103/135) | 71% (115/162) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (42/59) | 53% (31/58) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 37% (7/19) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (74/220) | 25% (49/194) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Radek Stepanek
Player
Daniel Brands
77%
(
75 of
98)
1st Serve %
75%
(
76 of
102)
11
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
54 of
76)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
28 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
31 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Daniel Brands
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Radek Stepanek
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
13 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Radek Stepanek | Daniel Brands |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Radek Stepanek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Radek Stepanek
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
9
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
95
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Dmitry Tursunov
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
15
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
27 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
107
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
John-Patrick Smith
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
3
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
0
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Blaz Kavcic
55%
(
63 of
114)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
104)
8
Aces
2
13
Double Faults
10
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
43 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
114
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 6-7(4) 8-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Sekou Bangoura
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Radek Stepanek
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Arthur De Greef
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Marcos Baghdatis
43%
(
38 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52%
(
26 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Enrique Lopez-Perez
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
61%
(
65 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
65 of
113)
6
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
32%
(
13 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
42%
(
44 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
112
Total Points Won
107
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Brands Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Daniel Brands
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
118)
18
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
58 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
36 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
58 of
118)
134
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Blaz Rola
66%
(
93 of
140)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
109)
16
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
47 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
30 of
109)
123
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(5) 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Mark Whitehouse
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Alex Bolt
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Feliciano Lopez
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
67 of
88)
20
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Ryan Peniston
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Daniel Brands
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stepanek Vs Brands Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
