Prediction of Rachel Ann Jensen vs Aurora Gima Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Ann Jensen vs A. Gima

Rachel Ann Jensen

USA

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

237

Best Rank

164

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Aurora Gima

USA

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

237

Best Rank

164

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Jensen 1 - 2 Gima

They have played 8 sets in total, with Rachel Ann Jensen winning 4 and Aurora Gima winning 4. The last match between Aurora Gima and Rachel Ann Jensen was at the ITF York, 12-08-1991, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Aurora Gima getting the victory 2-6 6-1 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Jensen	1
Gima	2

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(Q3) ITF York(08-12-91)

Stats

Aurora Gima

Rachel Ann Jensen

(F) ITF Lady Lake(06-10-91)

Stats

Rachel Ann Jensen

Aurora Gima

(Q1) ITF Key Biscayne 1(02-11-91)

Stats

Aurora Gima

Rachel Ann Jensen

R. A. Jensen vs A. Gima H2H Profile

R. A. Jensen	Stats	A. Gima
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
48.98% (72-75)	Career Total W/L	51.41% (91-86)
1	Clay	0
0	Hard	2
2	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. A. Jensen vs A. Gima Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rachel Ann Jensen has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Aurora Gima has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rachel Ann Jensen, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Aurora Gima has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Rachel Ann Jensen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Aurora Gima has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Rachel Ann Jensen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Aurora Gima winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Rachel Ann Jensen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 18/16), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/3). Aurora Gima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 64/54), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 23/24).
Player level: In the last year, Rachel Ann Jensen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Aurora Gima has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Rachel Ann Jensen winning 1 times and Aurora Gima being victorious 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Rachel Ann Jensen winning 4 and Aurora Gima winning 4.
The last match between Rachel Ann Jensen and Aurora Gima was at the ITF York, 12-08-1991, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Aurora Gima getting the victory 2-6 6-1 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rachel Ann Jensen has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Aurora Gima has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rachel Ann Jensen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Aurora Gima has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Rachel Ann Jensen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Aurora Gima has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Rachel Ann Jensen vs Aurora Gima Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. A. Jensen vs A. Gima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. A. Jensen	Stats	A. Gima
1	H2H Matches Won	2
4	Sets Won	4
40	Games Won	36
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
33% (1/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	67% (2/3)
0% (0/2)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (2/2)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

R. A. Jensen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Houston - 10-04-1995
Q1 Alix CreekA. Creek	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
Jakarta - 02-01-1995
Q1 Elena TatarkovaE. Tatarkova	L	2-6 7-6 6-0	Stats
ITF Nuriootpa - 05-12-1994
Q1 Justine HodderJ. Hodder	L	6-3 2-1 RET	Stats
ITF Port Pirie - 28-11-1994
R3 Melissa BeadmanM. Beadman	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Q1 Jenny Ann FetchJ. Ann	W	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

A. Gima Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Tampico 10K - 28-10-1996
R3 Lucila BecerraL. Becerra	W	7-5 6-4	Stats
SF Tracey HieteT. Hiete	W	6-1 6-0	Stats
F Milagros SequeraM. Sequera	L	4-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Graciela VelezG. Velez	W	2-6 6-2 6-4	Stats
R4 Julia BodenJ. Boden	W	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

R. A. Jensen vs A. Gima Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. A. Jensen	Stats	A. Gima
48.98% (72/75)	YTD Win/Loss	51.41% (91/86)
49.09% (161/167)	Sets Win/Loss	51.85% (210/195)
49.64% (1513/1535)	Games Win/Loss	50.75% (1850/1795)
48.98% (48/50)	Hard Win/Loss	54.24% (64/54)
52.94% (18/16)	Clay Win/Loss	48.94% (23/24)
50.00% (6/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	16.67% (1/5)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
495.2	Average Opponent Rank	528.17
50.00% (2/2)	Slam W/L	50.00% (2/2)
54.43% (43/36)	Challenger W/L	53.72% (65/56)
0.00% (0/3)	Futures W/L	50.00% (3/3)
49% (71/145)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	52% (91/176)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
61% (19/31)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (13/26)
50% (19/38)	Deciding Set Win %	46% (23/50)
87% (70/61)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (99/81)
13% (70/9)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (99/18)
13% (75/10)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (78/10)