Quinn Gleason vs Amanda Rodgers Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gleason vs Rodgers analysis and find out who is favored!
Quinn Gleason vs Amanda Rodgers Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gleason has won 45.45% of points on his second serve, while Rodgers has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gleason, in recent form, has won 56.58% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rodgers has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.4% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gleason has saved 34.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rodgers has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gleason has won 27.78% of matches played (W/L 5/ 13), with Rodgers winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gleason has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 82/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Rodgers has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 69/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Gleason has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 35.71% of matches (W/L 5/ 9), where as Rodgers has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gleason winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Gleason winning 4 and Rodgers winning 0. The last match between Gleason and Rodgers was at the Brussels, 18-07-2017, First, Clay with Quinn Gleason getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gleason and Rodgers have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gleason winning 0 times and Rodgers 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gleason winning 0, and Rodgers 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gleason has played against opponents with an average rank of 325.28 while Rodgers has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gleason has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rodgers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gleason has converted 62.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rodgers has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gleason 2 - 0 Rodgers
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
801
Rank
323
High
29
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
491
High
31
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (153-125)
Career Total W/L
49% (124-130)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,345
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Quinn Gleason | Amanda Rodgers |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 24 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 0:56:0 | 0:56:0 |
1st Serve % | 73% (47/64) | 57% (36/63) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (33/47) | 56% (20/36) |
2nd Serve Win% | 29% (5/17) | 48% (13/27) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 50% (2/4) |
Return Points W% | 48% (30/63) | 41% (26/64) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
Quinn Gleason
Player
Amanda Rodgers
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
6-4 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Quinn Gleason | Amanda Rodgers |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Quinn Gleason Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Gabriela Lee
Player
Quinn Gleason
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ipek Oz
Player
Quinn Gleason
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Quinn Gleason
51%
(
44 of
86)
1st Serve %
78%
(
70 of
90)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Quinn Gleason
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Quinn Gleason
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
8
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Quinn Gleason
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nina Radovanovic
Player
Quinn Gleason
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Magali Kempen
Player
Quinn Gleason
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
79%
(
68 of
86)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
50%
(
44 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Amanda Rodgers Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Amanda Rodgers
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Andie K. Daniell
Player
Amanda Rodgers
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Amanda Rodgers
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Chieh-Yu Hsu
Player
Amanda Rodgers
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Lauren Davis
Player
Amanda Rodgers
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 2-6 6-0 | H2H |
view more